Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/106522
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorSerna Zuluaga, Santiagoes-ES
dc.contributor.authorGerres, Timoes-ES
dc.contributor.authorCossent Arín, Rafaeles-ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-21T11:32:49Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-21T11:32:49Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/106522-
dc.description.abstractes-ES
dc.description.abstractRenewable and low-carbon hydrogen are expected to play a central role in Europe’s transition toward climate neutrality. Understanding the economics of hydrogen production is essential to ensure its large-scale deployment.Most existing studies have focused on renewable hydrogen (known as RFNBO in EU jargon), showing that strict temporal-correlation limit operating hours reducing profitability. In contrast, the more flexible criteria defined for low-carbon hydrogen have received limited attention, although they could alter the economics of electrolytic production. Low-carbon hydrogen is defined as hydrogen that achieves at least a 70 emission reduction relative to a fossil benchmark, without requiring renewable electricity certification. Thus, electrolyzers can extend operating hours by partially relying on grid electricity. Using a novel mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model, this paper explores optimal electrolyzer operation strategies when combining RFNBO and low-carbon production across different national electricity mixes. Results show that current EU legislation provides sufficient flexibility to enable near-continuous operation, albeit at the cost of higher production-related emissions. However, small variations in efficiency or grid emission intensity can determine whether a plant operates year-round or remains idle, revealing regulatory discontinuities. These discontinuities pose risks for grid-connected facilities, which can be mitigated through long-term PPAs or dedicated renewable assets. Finally, the analysis highlights that optimal operation also depends on hydrogen demand regulation: while some off-takers must meet RFNBO quota obligations, others comply with GHG-reduction targets. Consequently, there is no universal optimum, and strategies must adapt to both the plant’s electricity mix and the specific market incentives governing hydrogen use.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.titleBeyond green hydrogen: the role of low-carbon hydrogen in the optimal operation of electrolytic plantses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperes_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draftes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.keywordses-ES
dc.keywordsHydrogen, RFNBO, Low-carbon fuels, Electrolyzer operation, EU regulationen-GB
Aparece en las colecciones: Documentos de Trabajo

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Tamaño Formato  
IIT-25-330WP.pdf1,05 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir     Request a copy


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.