| dc.contributor.author | Sánchez-Girón Martínez, Beatriz | es-ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-03T08:32:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-03T08:32:59Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-10-01 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11531/105841 | |
| dc.description | Capítulos en libros | es_ES |
| dc.description.abstract | . | es-ES |
| dc.description.abstract | The European Union Framework Directive provides for protection against
discrimination on various grounds, including disability. However, its material
scope is only limited to the employment field. What seemed to be a breakthrough
in anti-discrimination law (as it finally stepped forward to embrace protected
grounds in addition to the traditional ones such as gender and race) has been
evaluated and criticized from different points of view: it is argued that, nowadays,
European regulation on protection against discrimination still is flawed. One of
the prior issues that may be solved is the determination of the personal scope
of application of the Framework Directive. Considering the European legislator
avoided defining disability, this onus has been on the European Court of Justice,
that has outlined a definition this term in order to implement the Directive provisions. In doing so, the influence of the disability model that has prevailed at each
moment has been crucial, entailing a struggle among the former medical model
and the emerging social model. Insofar as the criteria of this latter has been imposed, a Human Rights approach was developed, and the personal scope of the
Framework Directive could be extended to a wide variety of health problems
covered by the notion of disability. It is worth mentioning the case-law that has
marked a turning point for the European definition of disability, as Chacón Navas, HK Denmark, Z vs. A, FOA, and Daouidi, all of them referred hereinafter.
This article has two main objectives. First of all, to identify the elements given
by the European Court of Justice for the purpose of defining disability, and for
this purpose the leading cases will be analyzed. Secondly, according to the social
developments in disabilities studies, some concerns about the evolution of the
dynamic concept of disability will be outlined. The article concludes with brief
final remarks on the future development of the disability concept within the
European non-discrimination regulations. | en-GB |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | en-GB | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | New Bulgarian University (, Bulgaria) | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España | es_ES |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ | es_ES |
| dc.source | Libro: защита от дискриминация в българия, в европа и в света = [Protection Against Discrimination in Bulgaria, Europe, and the World], Página inicial: 207, Página final: 225 | es_ES |
| dc.title | Challenges on European Non-Discrimination Law from the Social Model of Disability Approach | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart | es_ES |
| dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
| dc.rights.holder | | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.keywords | . | es-ES |
| dc.keywords | Disability, impairment, limitation, non-discrimination, European Court of Justice, health condition, employment, equality | en-GB |