Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDagnall, Neiles-ES
dc.contributor.authorDrinkwater, Kenneth Grahames-ES
dc.contributor.authorDenovan, Andrewes-ES
dc.contributor.authorEscolá Gascon, Alexes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-23T10:13:00Z
dc.date.available2025-10-23T10:13:00Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-10es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1448067es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstract.es-ES
dc.description.abstractUsing network analysis (NA), this study examined interrelationships between advocacy of scientifically unsubstantiated beliefs (i.e., Paranormal and Conspiracy Endorsement) and positive wellbeing outcomes (i.e., Coping, Meaning in Life, SelfEsteem, and Satisfaction with Life). A total of 1,667 participants completed study measures. Analysis revealed that Paranormal Belief (PB) and Self-Esteem were central variables. Although not directly connected, common relationships existed with Search for Meaning in Life and Avoidant Coping. PB was most strongly linked (positively) with Conspiracy Endorsement, the Cognitive-Perceptual dimension of schizotypy, Search, and Avoidant Coping. Connections indicated that PB potentially mediated relationships between Schizotypy, Search, and Avoidant Coping. SelfEsteem was most strongly linked positively with the Presence of Meaning in Life, Active Coping, and Satisfaction with Life, and negatively with Avoidant Coping and Search. Network examination also revealed that Self-Esteem bridged relationships between Coping (Active and Avoidant), Meaning in Life (Search and Presence), and Satisfaction with Life. While the correlation between PB and Self-Esteem was small, the significance of these nodes suggested that their indirect interaction (through Search and Avoidant Coping) influenced factors related to positive wellbeing. This implied that the connection between PB and enhanced Self-Esteem positively impacted wellbeing. Conversely, PB associated with low Self-Esteem reflected poorer psychological health. Therefore, subsequent research should test this notion using specific belief facets.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Frontiers in Psychology, Periodo: 1, Volumen: 16, Número: , Página inicial: 1, Página final: 10es_ES
dc.titleParanormal belief, conspiracy endorsement, and positive wellbeing: a network analysises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywords.es-ES
dc.keywordsparanormal belief, conspiracy theory endorsement, positive wellbeing, network analysis, scientifically unsubstantiated beliefsen-GB


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España