Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorHawila, Dialaes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-05T05:27:55Z
dc.date.available2026-02-05T05:27:55Z
dc.date.issued2026-02-02es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2194-6167es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2025-0040es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/108556
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractConcerns about faltering productivity have led to calls for grand fiscal strategies to ignite economic growth. Targeted spending sprees are believed to be lifting economies out of stagnation. This policies shift stands in stark contrast to the type of fiscal restraint (austerity) advocated after the Global Financial Crisis. This paper examines whether fiscal policy can lift economic growth after recessions characterised by prolonged economic stagnation – also known as scarring-while keeping debt under control. I find the odds of such an expansionary debt-reducing fiscal policy are limited due to a typical deficit bias in the short term – a combination of much lower tax revenues and reduced government spending – and the use of tax-based consolidations in the longer run. Higher taxes even push governments to raise spending to higher levels a decade after the recession. The combination of procyclical fiscal policy in the short term, with distortionary tax increases in the long term is unlikely to lift productivity growth.es-ES
dc.description.abstractConcerns about faltering productivity have led to calls for grand fiscal strategies to ignite economic growth. Targeted spending sprees are believed to be lifting economies out of stagnation. This policies shift stands in stark contrast to the type of fiscal restraint (austerity) advocated after the Global Financial Crisis. This paper examines whether fiscal policy can lift economic growth after recessions characterised by prolonged economic stagnation – also known as scarring-while keeping debt under control. I find the odds of such an expansionary debt-reducing fiscal policy are limited due to a typical deficit bias in the short term – a combination of much lower tax revenues and reduced government spending – and the use of tax-based consolidations in the longer run. Higher taxes even push governments to raise spending to higher levels a decade after the recession. The combination of procyclical fiscal policy in the short term, with distortionary tax increases in the long term is unlikely to lift productivity growth.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.sourceRevista: The Economists' Voice, Periodo: 1, Volumen: En imprenta, Número: , Página inicial: 0, Página final: 0es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleFiscal Discipline Under Scarring: Do Grand Spending Plans Lift Growth and Curb Debt?es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordsfiscal policy; recession; scarring; debt; growthes-ES
dc.keywordsfiscal policy; recession; scarring; debt; growthen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem