Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMastropietro, Paoloes-ES
dc.contributor.authorBruninx, Kennethes-ES
dc.contributor.authorCossent Arín, Rafaeles-ES
dc.contributor.authorBello Morales, Antonioes-ES
dc.contributor.authorRodilla Rodríguez, Pabloes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-10T05:29:04Z
dc.date.available2026-02-10T05:29:04Z
dc.date.issued2026-02-27es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0360-3199es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153775es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/108643
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractSupport mechanisms for low-carbon hydrogen are becoming increasingly widespread, with large amounts of public funding being invested to underpin the initial development of this new energy sector. A clear distinction has emerged in support schemes for hydrogen production through electrolysis, depending on whether remuneration is expressed per MW of electrolysis capacity or per kg of hydrogen produced. This dichotomy has led many experts to draw parallels with support schemes for renewable electricity generation and their distinction between capacity- and production-based mechanisms. This article contributes to this discussion by: i) providing a theoretical assessment of the similarities and differences between low-carbon hydrogen support schemes and other support mechanisms introduced in the electricity sector; and ii) developing a quantitative assessment based on simulations to explore the impact of selecting a remuneration format for hydrogen support, and to evaluate the economic signals sent to project developers by both remuneration formats.es-ES
dc.description.abstractSupport mechanisms for low-carbon hydrogen are becoming increasingly widespread, with large amounts of public funding being invested to underpin the initial development of this new energy sector. A clear distinction has emerged in support schemes for hydrogen production through electrolysis, depending on whether remuneration is expressed per MW of electrolysis capacity or per kg of hydrogen produced. This dichotomy has led many experts to draw parallels with support schemes for renewable electricity generation and their distinction between capacity- and production-based mechanisms. This article contributes to this discussion by: i) providing a theoretical assessment of the similarities and differences between low-carbon hydrogen support schemes and other support mechanisms introduced in the electricity sector; and ii) developing a quantitative assessment based on simulations to explore the impact of selecting a remuneration format for hydrogen support, and to evaluate the economic signals sent to project developers by both remuneration formats.en-GB
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.sourceRevista: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: , Página inicial: 153775-1, Página final: 153775-11es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleRemuneration formats in support schemes for hydrogen from electrolysis: What to incentivise and why?es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordsHydrogen economy; Hydrogen subsidies; Support mechanism; Risk-hedging; Direct grant; Fixed premium; Variable premiumes-ES
dc.keywordsHydrogen economy; Hydrogen subsidies; Support mechanism; Risk-hedging; Direct grant; Fixed premium; Variable premiumen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem