Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMoiseeva, Ekaterinaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorWogrin, Sonjaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorHesamzadeh, Mohammad Rezaes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-01T04:06:29Z
dc.date.available2017-03-01T04:06:29Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0377-2217es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps:doi.org10.1016j.ejor.2017.02.028es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractes-ES
dc.description.abstractA ramp rate usually defines the speed at which an electric power producer can decrease or increase its production in limited time. The availability of fast-ramping generators significantly affects the economic dispatch, especially in the systems with high penetration of intermittent energy sources, e.g. wind power, since the uctuations in supply are common and sometimes unpredictable. One of the regulatory practices of how to impel generators to provide their true ramp rates is to separate the stages of submitting the bids on ramp rate and production. In this paper we distinguish two types of market structures: one-stage - when electric power producers are deciding their production and ramp rate at the same time, or two-stage - when generators decide their ramp rate first, and choose their production levels at the second stage. We employ one-stage and two-stage equilibrium models respectively to represent these market setups and use a conjectured price response parameter ranging from perfect competition to the Cournot oligopoly to investigate the effect of the markett competition structure on the strategic decisions of the generators. We compare these two market setups in a symmetric duopoly case with two time periods and prove that in the two-stage market setup the level of ramp rate is independent of the strategic behavior in the spot market and generally lower than the one offered in the one-stage setup. We also show that the ramp-rate levels in one- and two-stage models coincide at the Cournot oligopoly. We extend the model to asymmetry, several load periods, portfolio bidding, and uncertainty, and show that withholding the ramp rate still occurs in both models. Our findings prove that market regulators cannot rely on only separating the decision stages as an effective measure to mitigate market power and in certain cases it may lead to an adverse effect.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.sourceRevista: European Journal of Operational Research, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: 2, Página inicial: 755, Página final: 771es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleGeneration flexibility in ramp rates: strategic behavior and lessons for electricity market designes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.keywordses-ES
dc.keywordsOR in energy, ramp rate, strategic decision-making, bilevel programming, equilibrium problemsen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem