Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGorenstein Dedecca, Joaoes-ES
dc.contributor.authorLumbreras Sancho, Saraes-ES
dc.contributor.authorRamos Galán, Andréses-ES
dc.contributor.authorHakvoort, Rudi A.es-ES
dc.contributor.authorHerder, Paulien M.es-ES
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T09:08:28Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T09:08:28Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0140-9883es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps:doi.org10.1016j.eneco.2018.04.037es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractes-ES
dc.description.abstractThe development of offshore transmission and wind power generation in the North Sea of Europe is advancing fast, but there are significant barriers to an integrated offshore grid in the region. This offshore grid is a multi-level, multi-actor system requiring a governance decision-making approach, but there is currently no proven governance framework for it, or for the expansion planning of the European power system in general. In addition, existing offshore expansion planning models do not endogenously include governance considerations, such as country vetoes to integrated lines. We develop a myopic Mixed-Integer Linear Programming model of offshore generation and transmission expansion planning to study the effect of integrated governance constraints. These constraints limit investments in integrated lines: non-conventional lines linking offshore wind farms to other countries or to other farms. Each constraint affects the system (including the main transmission corridors), transmission technologies and welfare distribution differently. We apply our model to a long-term case study of the 2030-2050 offshore expansion pathways using data from the e-Highway2050 project. Results confirm that the offshore grid is beneficial to society. Integrated governance constraints induce a modest loss of social welfare, but do not change significantly the existing welfare distribution asymmetry between countries and actor groups. They do strongly affect the interaction of line technologies and types (conventional or integrated), so the impact of the integrated governance constraints is more visible on the grid topology than on welfare levels and distribution. We highlight the need to consider technology and type interactions in expansion planning, especially between multiterminal HVDC and integrated transmission lines. Also, an offshore governance framework should address the use of multiterminal HVDC in a non-integrated grid, but this is a second-best option compared to an integrated grid.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Energy Economics, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: , Página inicial: 376, Página final: 392es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleExpansion planning of the North Sea offshore grid: simulation of integrated governance constraintses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordses-ES
dc.keywordsExpansion planningGovernanceSimulationNorth SeaOffshore gridOffshore winden-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem