Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorPrieto Ursúa, Maríaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorJódar Anchía, Rafaeles-ES
dc.contributor.authorGismero González, María Elenaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco Galán, María Josées-ES
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Díaz, María Pilares-ES
dc.contributor.authorCagigal de Gregorio, Virginiaes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-14T10:03:57Z
dc.date.available2018-08-14T10:03:57Z
dc.date.issued26/07/2018es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1050-8619es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/29586
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractpes-ES
dc.description.abstractAmong the beliefs and concepts people hold about the nature of forgiveness, their notions of conditionality and unconditionality have not received sufficient study. The concept of conditional forgiveness posits that before forgiveness can be granted, the offender must take certain steps and meet specific conditions. From an unconditional forgiveness concept, the victim can forgive independently of the behavior of the wrongdoer. Hence, the aim of our study has been to develop a strong psychometric instrument to measure the beliefs people hold about the conditionality of forgiveness. This article presents the development and validation of a tool to measure these beliefs. Study 1 was comprised of 181 participants, whilst 492 conformed Study 2 and 109 took part in Study 3. Internal consistency and validity were analyzed. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted, along with correlational analysis to test convergent validity, stability and prediction capability. Results show a two-dimensional structure of the Conditional Unconditional Forgiveness Scale, indicating the appropriateness of this tool to assess beliefs about the conditionality of forgiveness. The belief in the unconditional nature of forgiveness showed positive and significant correlations with all the measurements of offense-specific forgiveness. On the other hand, the belief that forgiveness should be conditional showed lower correlations with all the forgiveness measurements. Not only the ultimate level of forgiveness the subjects experienced, but their emotional experience of the process as well can be very different depending on their views of forgiveness, among them their beliefs about conditionality.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.sourceRevista: International Journal For The Psychology of Religion, Periodo: 3, Volumen: 28, Número: 3, Página inicial: 206, Página final: 222es_ES
dc.subject.otherPsicología clínica y de la salud - Hiwares_ES
dc.titleConditional or Unconditional Forgiveness? An Instrument to Measure the Conditionality of Forgivenesses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordspes-ES
dc.keywordsforgiveness assessment, unconditional forgiveness, reconciliation, CUFS Scaleen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España