Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBravo Sánchez, Alfredoes-ES
dc.contributor.authorAbian Vicen, Pabloes-ES
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Díaz, Fernandoes-ES
dc.contributor.authorAbian Vicen, Javieres-ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-27T16:32:29Z
dc.date.available2021-04-27T16:32:29Z
dc.date.issued23/04/2021es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0268-0033es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105366es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/55549
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstract.es-ES
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to describe the differences in structural and mechanical properties between operated and non-injured Achilles tendons in senior badminton players who had had Achilles tendon surgery and had returned to play. Methods: Eighteen players (age = 48.9(10.0)years), assigned to the unilateral Achilles tendon rupture group and 177 non-injured players (age = 55.4(9.4)years), assigned to the control group. A Logiq®S8 ultrasound was used to study tendon structure and elastography index values and a Myoton®PRO hand-held myotonometer was used to record the stiffness of the Achilles tendon. Findings: In Achilles tendon rupture group, operated tendons showed higher values than non-injured ones in thickness (Operated = 9.03(2.67)mm vs. non-injured = 5.88(0.88)mm; P < 0.001), width (Operated = 18.44 (3.20)mm vs. non-injured = 16.80(1.97)mm; P = 0.039), cross sectional area (Operated = 140.33(60.29)mm2 vs. non-injured = 74.40(17.09)mm2; P < 0.001) and elastography index (Operated = 2.05(1.35)A.U. vs. noninjured = 1.47(0.62)A.U.; P = 0.025). The bilateral differences shown by the Achilles tendon rupture group were greater than the bilateral differences shown by the control group for thickness (P < 0.001), width (P = 0.001), cross sectional area (P < 0.001), tone (P = 0.006) and dynamic stiffness (Achilles tendon rupture group = 10.85 (23.90)N∙m􀀀 1. vs. control group = 0.18(18.83)N∙m􀀀 1; P = 0.031). Interpretation: Surgery on the Achilles tendon and adaptation to the mobilisation and strength training during rehabilitation could provoke structural and mechanical differences compared to the non-injured tendon. Furthermore, the differences between both Achilles tendons in the Achilles tendon rupture group was higher than the asymmetry observed between dominant and non-dominant Achilles tendons in the control group. In addition, the higher logarithmic decrement values showed by non injured tendons in the Achilles tendon rupture group could be a tendinous injury risk factor.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoes-ESes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Clinical Biomechanics, Periodo: 1, Volumen: 85, Número: , Página inicial: 1, Página final: 6es_ES
dc.titleStructural and mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon in senior badminton players: Operated vs. non-injured tendonses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywords.es-ES
dc.keywordsBadminton; Elastography; Achilles tendon; Myotonometer; Ultrasounden-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España