Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLoroño Goikoetxea, Gaizkaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Zaldívar, José Manueles-ES
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Octavio, Jesús Ramónes-ES
dc.contributor.authorDorado Nuño, Saúl Manueles-ES
dc.contributor.authorArias Paniagua, Ana Maríaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorCisneros Cabello, Rafaeles-ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T11:53:46Z
dc.date.available2021-06-07T11:53:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2040-7939es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps:doi.org10.1002cnm.3385es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractes-ES
dc.description.abstractFluid dynamics generated by irrigation needles have not been deeply analyzed in root canal irregularities such as apical ramifications or isthmus where the cleaning capacity of irrigants might be compromised and hence the treatment outcome. The goal of this study was to compare the key irrigation parameters (flow pattern, irrigant velocity, apical pressure, and shear stress) between two irrigation needles and the additional effect of aspiration cannulas through computational fluid dynamics. A 3D-model consisting of two canals linked by an isthmus was modeled. The abovementioned needles irrigated the primary canal, whereas an aspiration cannula was located inside the secondary canal. Both the geometry definition and spatial discretization were carried out with ANSYS 16.2, through which six different simulations were performed: lateral exit (LE) needle, frontal exit (FE) needle, LE and cannula in crown (LEC), FE and cannula in crown (FEC), LE and cannula in middle third (LEM), FE and cannula in middle third (FEM). FE and FEM showed that the irrigation flow only passes through the isthmus in the most apical section (maximum irrigant velocity shear stress = 8.44 ms 1628.44 Pa and 8.63 ms 1185.69 Pa, respectively). However, the remaining simulations showed the irrigation flow passing through the isthmus twice, through the most apical section first and through the upper part of the isthmus later (maximum irrigant velocity shear stress = 8.48 ms 1298.24 Pa (LE), 8.61 ms 1261.36 Pa (LEM), 8.61 ms 1355.24 Pa (LEC), 8.59 ms 1256.87 Pa (FEC)). Furthermore, the highest velocity values were detected when aspiration cannulas were added.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.sourceRevista: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: 10, Página inicial: e3385-1, Página final: e3385-10es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleCFD analysis on the effect of combining positive and negative pressure during the irrigation of artificial isthmuseses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.keywordses-ES
dc.keywordsaspiration cannula, CFD, endodontics, irrigation, needleen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem