Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Frías, José Danieles-ES
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Cerrada, Aurelioes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-15T11:28:23Z
dc.date.available2016-01-15T11:28:23Z
dc.date.issued2003-03-20es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/5715
dc.descriptionCapítulos en libroses_ES
dc.description.abstractes-ES
dc.description.abstractIn this paper a comparison is made between two nonlinear control techniques for induction motors, namely Lyapunov-integral control and conventional direct vector control. The latter uses nonlinear state feedback in an "ad-hoc" manner while the former systematically derives the nonlinear feedback laws to ensure that the output-tracking errors are zero. The comparison has been done studying their differences analytically and testing the two controllers in the same conditions. Simulation and experimental results show that Lyapunov-integral and traditional vector controllers can be applied in discrete time with low sampling frequency (2 kHz), obtaining approximately the same performance.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.publisherSin editorial (Sevilla, España)es_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.sourceLibro: 28th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society - IECON 2002, Página inicial: 2079-2084, Página final:es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleA comparative study between two nonlinear control techniques for induction motor driveses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartes_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.keywordses-ES
dc.keywordsNo disponibleNot availableen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem