Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCaron, Simones-ES
dc.contributor.authorHerding, Lesliees-ES
dc.contributor.authorBinyamin, Yanives-ES
dc.contributor.authorBaidossi, Mubeenes-ES
dc.contributor.authorVinetsky, Yelenaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorMorales Sabio, Ángeles-ES
dc.contributor.authorHildebrandt, Christinaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorReoyo-Prats, Reinees-ES
dc.contributor.authorFaugeroux, Olivieres-ES
dc.contributor.authorAgüero Bruna, Alinaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Catela, Sergioes-ES
dc.contributor.authorSutter, Florianes-ES
dc.contributor.authorRöger, Marces-ES
dc.contributor.authorManzano Agugliaro, Franciscoes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-24T04:06:01Z
dc.date.available2022-01-24T04:06:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0927-0248es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps:doi.org10.1016j.solmat.2022.111579es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractes-ES
dc.description.abstractSolar thermal absorber coatings play an important role in the opto-thermal efficiency of receivers in Concentrated Solar Power (CSP). Two standard figures of merit are the solar absorptance αsol and thermal emittance εth, derived from spectral directional hemispherical reflectance measurements at room temperature. These two figures of merit allow comparing coating formulations in terms of performance and durability. In this study, a black coating and a solar selective coating are optically characterized by different laboratories to compare spectral datasets, solar absorptance αsol and thermal emittance εth calculations. The comparison includes various benchtop spectrophotometers operating in the UV-VIS-NIR and Infrared spectral ranges as well as three commercial portable reflectometersemissometers. A good agreement is found between the nine parties participating in this intercomparison campaign. The black coating αsol value is 96.6 ± 0.2, while the solar selective coating αsol value is 94.5 ± 0.4. For the thermal emittance, spectral data is concatenated and integrated from 0.3 to 16 μm. The black coating εth value calculated at 650 °C is 80.8 ± 3.8, while the solar selective coating εth value calculated at 650 °C is 25.0 ± 0.5.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: , Página inicial: 111579-1, Página final: 111579-15es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleLaboratory intercomparison of solar absorptance and thermal emittance measurements at room temperaturees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordses-ES
dc.keywordsConcentrated solar power; Solar thermal; Absorber coating; Solar absorptance; Thermal emittanceen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem