Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorParaskevopoulos, Ioannises-ES
dc.contributor.authorFiguerola-Ferretti Garrigues, Isabel Catalinaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorMcCrorie, Roderickes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-19T07:44:40Z
dc.date.available2022-07-19T07:44:40Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-10es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0140-9883es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.05.002es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/70770
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractEn este paper utilizamos Phillips test para medir las divergencias del precio del petroleo desde los fundamentales económicos y otras variables usados como proxy, como ViX para el periodo desde crisis financiera en 2007-2008 y el derivo de los precios en 2014-2016.es-ES
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides an analysis of oil prices during and in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis, concentrating on the 2007–08 price spike and the 2014–16 price decline. The mildly explosive/multiple bubbles testing strategy by Phillips, Shi and Yu (2015, International Economic Review 56(4), 1043–1133) is used to test for price departures from an underlying stochastic trend and to assess whether any such departures can be explained by fundamentals or other proxy variables. The test dates two significant time periods in both Brent and WTI nominal and real front-month futures prices: a mildly explosive episode during the 2007–08 spike, prior to the peak of the Global Financial Crisis; and a significantly shorter, negative such episode during the 2014–16 price decline, whose commencement is dated around a key OPEC meeting in November 2014. Evidence using other commodity prices points to explanatory factors beyond commodity markets. A global economic activity proxy is found to be decisive in the episode in mid-2008; excess speculation is not. U.S. shale oil production, though contributing to the post-June 2014 price decline, is not seen to have been decisive. Against some recent work tying the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) to oil futures prices, we find no evidence that the VIX decisively affected oil price levels during the sample period. The results are compared and contrasted with those obtained by Baumeister and Kilian (2016, Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 3, 131-158) via a forecasting approach based on a structural vector autoregressive model without financial variables. Taken altogether, the results herein provide new evidence based on formal statistical testing that helps resolve a number of recent controversies in the oil price literature.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Energy Economics, Periodo: 1, Volumen: 87, Número: 3, Página inicial: 1, Página final: 25es_ES
dc.titleMild explosivity in recent crude oil priceses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderEl artículo está aceptado con fecha de publicación prevista Marzo 2020es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.keywordspetroleo crudo , precios de petroleo, Crisis Financiera Global, ViX, Proceso explosivo, ADF testes-ES
dc.keywordsCrude oil, Oil prices, Global Financial Crisis, Fundamentals, CBOE Volatility Index (VIX), Mildly explosive process, Generalized sup ADF testen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem