Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSáez Angulo, Rosa M.es-ES
dc.contributor.authorLinares Llamas, Pedroes-ES
dc.contributor.authorLeal López de Sagredo, Juliánes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-23T03:07:23Z
dc.date.available2016-05-23T03:07:23Z
dc.date.issued1998-05-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0961-9534es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00016-6es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractThis paper has assessed the externalities of biomass for electricity production, and compared them with those of coal. The effects studied have been those on human health, CO2 balance, soil erosion, non-point-source pollution, and the employment. The methodology used has been the one developed by the ExternE Project of the European Commission, which has been extended by CIEMAT to cover socioeconomic impacts. A more site-specific methodology for dealing with soil erosion and non-point-source pollution is also proposed. This methodology has been applied to assess the externalities of a proposed biomass power plant in Spain, and also to a hypothetical coal power plant in the same location. In spite of the high uncertainty involved in the assessment, results show that, when externalities are introduced into the cost analysis, the total costs of biomass electricity is lower than that of coal, under the assumptions used.es-ES
dc.description.abstractThis paper has assessed the externalities of biomass for electricity production, and compared them with those of coal. The effects studied have been those on human health, CO2 balance, soil erosion, non-point-source pollution, and the employment. The methodology used has been the one developed by the ExternE Project of the European Commission, which has been extended by CIEMAT to cover socioeconomic impacts. A more site-specific methodology for dealing with soil erosion and non-point-source pollution is also proposed. This methodology has been applied to assess the externalities of a proposed biomass power plant in Spain, and also to a hypothetical coal power plant in the same location. In spite of the high uncertainty involved in the assessment, results show that, when externalities are introduced into the cost analysis, the total costs of biomass electricity is lower than that of coal, under the assumptions used.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Biomass and Bioenergy, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: 5/6, Página inicial: 469, Página final: 478es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleAssessment of the externalities of biomass energy, and a comparison of its costs with coales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordsExternalities, social costs, biomass, energy, methodologyes-ES
dc.keywordsExternalities, social costs, biomass, energy, methodologyen-GB


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Show simple item record