Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMontes Pita, María Josées-ES
dc.contributor.authorGuédez, Rafaeles-ES
dc.contributor.authorLinares Hurtado, José Ignacioes-ES
dc.contributor.authorReyes-Belmonte, M.A.es-ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-30T11:11:52Z
dc.date.available2023-08-30T11:11:52Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0196-8904es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117454es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstract.es-ES
dc.description.abstractThis work addresses the comparative thermo-economic study of different configurations of solar thermal power plants, based on supercritical power cycles and pressurised central receiver systems. For all the cases examined, two innovations are introduced in the solar subsystem, compared to other similar studies. Firstly, the heat transfer fluid in the receiver is either a pressurised gas or a supercritical fluid. Secondly, the receiver is composed of compact structures performing as absorber panels, arranged in a radial configuration. The investigation considers different supercritical CO2 recompression cycles of 50 MWe, including a novel proposal of a directly coupled cycle with heat input downstream of the turbine. Furthermore, the study evaluates different heat transfer fluids in the receiver, specifically CO2, N2, and He, concluding that the former is preferred due to its better thermal performance. The main results show that an increase in the receiver inlet pressure yields to a reduction in its size, favouring the thermal efficiency but penalising the optical efficiency of the solar field. Therefore, optimal working pressures may exist for each configuration, depending on the operating temperature. When comparing the optimal configurations, it is observed that the plant based on the intercooling cycle demonstrates the highest overall efficiency, reaching 32.05%. At last, an economic analysis is conducted to assess the viability of the identified optimal configurations. In this regard, the plant based on the partial-cooling cycle exhibits the lowest levelised cost of electricity at 0.15 $/kWh. This is primarily due to its lower investment cost. The innovative directly coupled cycle follows closely with a cost of 0.17 $/kWh, driven by its high electricity production resulting from its low self-consumption.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Energy Conversion and Management, Periodo: 1, Volumen: 293, Número: 117454, Página inicial: ., Página final: .es_ES
dc.subject.otherCátedra Rafael Mariño de Nuevas Tecnologías Energéticases_ES
dc.titleAdvances in solar thermal power plants based on pressurised central receivers and supercritical power cycleses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderSolicitud del autores_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.keywords.es-ES
dc.keywordsSolar thermal power plantMicrochannel receiverRadial configurationSupercritical power cycleSupercritical fluidPressurised gasen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem