Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorPersyn, Damiaanes-ES
dc.contributor.authorBarbero, Javieres-ES
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Lanchas, Jorgees-ES
dc.contributor.authorLecca, Patrizioes-ES
dc.contributor.authorMandras, Giovannies-ES
dc.contributor.authorSalotti, Simonees-ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-03T12:01:21Z
dc.date.available2023-10-03T12:01:21Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0022-4146es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12639es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstract.es-ES
dc.description.abstractWe analyze the general equilibrium effects of an asymmetric decrease in transport costs, combining a large-scale spatial dynamic general equilibrium model for 267 European NUTS-2 regions with a detailed transport model at the level of individual road segments. As a case study, we consider the impact of the road infrastructure investments in Central and Eastern Europe of the European Cohesion Policy. Our analysis suggests that the decrease in transportation costs benefits the targeted regions via substantial increases in gross domestic product (GDP) and welfare compared to the baseline, and a small increase in population. The geographic information embedded in the transport model leads to relatively large predicted benefits in peripheral countries such as Greece and Finland, which hardly receive funds, but whose trade links cross Central and Eastern Europe, generating profit from the investments there. The richer, Western European nontargeted regions also enjoy a higher GDP after the investment in the East, but these effects are smaller. Thus, the policy reduces interregional disparities. There are rippled patterns in the predicted policy spillovers. In nontargeted countries, regions trading more intensely with regions where the investment is taking place on average benefit more compared to other regions within the same country, but also compared to neighboring regions across an international border. We uncover that regions importing goods from Central and Eastern Europe enjoy the largest spillovers. These regions become more competitive and expand exports, to the detriment of other regions in the same country.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Journal of Regional Science, Periodo: 2, Volumen: 63, Número: 4, Página inicial: 755, Página final: 799es_ES
dc.titleThe ripple effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investmentes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywords.es-ES
dc.keywordseconomic geography, spatial dynamic general equilibrium modeling, transport infrastructureen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España