Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorHigueras, Alfonsoes-ES
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Gilbertoes-ES
dc.contributor.authorBolaños, María de Lourdeses-ES
dc.contributor.authorRedondo, María Victoriaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorOlazábal, Isabel M.es-ES
dc.contributor.authorRUIZ-TOVAR POLO, JAIMEes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-08T10:40:24Z
dc.date.available2024-03-08T10:40:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-13es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214946es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstract.es-ES
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have proven to be cost-effective in various surgical procedures, mainly in colorectal surgeries. However, there is still little scientific evidence evaluating the economic impact of their application in bariatric surgery. The present study aimed to compare the economic cost of performing a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following an ERAS protocol, with the costs of following a standard-of-care protocol. Patients and methods: A prospective non-randomized study of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients following an ERAS protocol and patients following a standard-of-care protocol. The total costs of the procedure were subdivided into pharmacological expenditures, surgical material, and time expenses, the price of complementary tests performed during the hospital stay, and costs related to the hospital stay. Results: The 84 patients included 58 women (69%) and 26 men (31%) with a mean age of 44.3 ± 11.6 years. There were no significant differences in age, gender, and distribution of comorbidities between groups. Postoperative pain, nausea or vomiting, and hospital stay were significantly lower within the ERAS group. The pharmacological expenditures, the price of complementary tests performed during the hospital stay, and the costs related to the hospital stay, were significantly lower in the ERAS group. There were no significant differences in the surgical material and surgical time costs between groups. Globally, the total cost of the procedure was significantly lower in the ERAS group with a mean saving of 1458.62$ per patient. The implementation of an ERAS protocol implied a mean saving of 21.25% of the total cost of the procedure. Conclusions: The implementation of an ERAS protocol significantly reduces the perioperative cost of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoes-ESes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.sourceRevista: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Periodo: 1, Volumen: 19, Número: 22, Página inicial: 14946, Página final: .es_ES
dc.titleEconomic impacto f the implementation o fan Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in a bariatric patient undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywords.es-ES
dc.keywordsRoux-en-Y gastric bypass; economic analysis; pharmacological costs; surgical material costs; surgical time costs; complementary test costs; bed occupancy costsen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España