Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorEscolá Gascon, Alexes-ES
dc.contributor.authorVilarasau Serra, Maxes-ES
dc.contributor.authorHouran,, Jameses-ES
dc.contributor.authorDagnall, Neiles-ES
dc.contributor.authorDrinkwater, Kennethes-ES
dc.contributor.authorDenovan, Andrewes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T11:12:33Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T11:12:33Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1550-8307es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2023.07.008 Getes_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstract.es-ES
dc.description.abstractThis report describes and presents the raw data from Escol` a-Gascon ´ et al.’s 1 remote viewing study, which extended similar experiments initiated by the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Remote viewing is a research technique that allows scientists to examine the degree to which individuals might access “distant (or nonlocal) information” without using known logical-perceptual channels. Many parapsychologists regard such effects as evidence of psychic (or psi) ability, whereas other researchers more cautiously designate beyond-chance results as “anomalous cognition.” The original research commissioned by the CIA provided favorable (though highly controversial) results, and several subsequent replications have shown positive and non-significant results. This has fostered heated scientific debate about the nature or meaning of these anomalous cognitions from theoretical, methodological, and statistical viewpoints. This report contextualizes the data obtained from our investigation that conceptually replicated the results of prior remote viewing experiments. Specifically, the authors found a positive association between emotional intelligence (EI) and positive performance (or “hits”) in remote viewing cognitive experiments, employing statistical controls based on structural equation modeling (SEM). We thus clarify certain methodological issues about our data to ensure transparency with their future use. We focus on three essential points: (1) more detailed explanation of our EI measures; (2) justification of our effect size calculation and why we obtained underestimated standard deviations per the population parameter; and (3) further consideration of the nuances with interpreting the statistical anomalies (or hits) in the remote viewing tests.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing, Periodo: 1, Volumen: 20, Número: 1, Página inicial: 10, Página final: 16es_ES
dc.titleResources on Escola-Gascón ´ et al.’s (2023) remote viewing research per the original CIA experimentses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderpolitica editoriales_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.keywords.es-ES
dc.keywordsRemote viewing Central Intelligence Agency Anomalous cognitions Skepticism Parapsychologyen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem