Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRUIZ-TOVAR POLO, JAIMEes-ES
dc.contributor.authorLlavero, Carolinaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Fuertes, Montieles-ES
dc.contributor.authorDurán, Manueles-ES
dc.contributor.authorPérez López, Mercedeses-ES
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Marín, Andréses-ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-09T13:50:20Z
dc.date.available2024-12-09T13:50:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1072-7515es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.02.031es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstract.es-ES
dc.description.abstractBackground The best alimentary and biliopancreatic limb (BPL) lengths in the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) still remain unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a BPL of 70 vs 120 cm, with a constant AL of 150 cm on long-term weight loss, remission of comorbidities, and supplementation needs after RYGB. Patients and Methods A prospective randomized study of morbidly obese patients undergoing RYGB was performed. Patients were randomized into two groups: those patients undergoing RYGB with a BPL of 70 cm (BPL 70 cm) and those ones undergoing RYGB with a BPL of 120 cm (BPL 120 cm). BMI, excess BMI loss (EBMIL), remission of comorbidities and specific vitamin and mineral supplementation needs at 1, 2, and 5 years were analyzed. Results Two hundred fifty-three patients were included in each group. There were no significant differences in BMI, EBMIL and the remission of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia between groups at 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. Patients from group BPL 120 cm required greater specific supplementation of vitamin B12, folic acid, and vitamin A during all the follow-up. Conclusion A RYGB with 120 cm BPL does not achieve greater weight loss or remission of comorbidities than a RYGB with 70 cm BPL but is associated with greater deficiencies of vitamin B12, vitamin A, and folic acid.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Journal of The American College of Surgeons, Periodo: 1, Volumen: 230, Número: 5, Página inicial: 766, Página final: 774es_ES
dc.titleIncisional Surgical-site infection after abdominal fascial closure with Triclosan-coated barbed suture vs Triclosan-coated Polydioxanone loop suture vs Polydioxanone loop suture in emergent abdominal surgery: A randomized clinical triales_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywords.es-ES
dc.keywordsRoux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Biliopancreatic Limb (BPL) Weight Loss Comorbidity Remission Vitamin Deficienciesen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España