Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMartínez Beltrán, María Jesúses-ES
dc.contributor.authorFidalgo Herrera, Alberto Javieres-ES
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Ruiz, Jose Antonioes-ES
dc.contributor.authorde la Torre Montero, Julio Césares-ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-09T12:40:25Z
dc.date.available2020-10-09T12:40:25Z
dc.date.issued09/10/2020es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2411-9660es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/designs4040043es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/51703
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstract.es-ES
dc.description.abstractThe cervical spine is one of the most frequently injured joints in a car accident. References for the range of motion (ROM) that should be expected in a person are needed to stage the injuries. The two main objectives of this paper are to clinically validate a measuring device for the cervical spine, and to assess if the use of different ROM reference values will render different results from the American Medical Association (AMA) ROM guidelines. The present study is divided into 2 phases, a validation phase with 55 subjects and a case-control phase with 80 subjects. A BTS (Bioengineering Technology and System) system and the EBI-5 (estudio biomecánico integral) system were used for the present investigation. The intraclass correlation agreement value between both measuring devices is considered very good with a Cronbach alpha up to 0.9 in every dimension. Correlations (r) between variables are very high, not showing any values lower than 0.887. All comparisons between using AMA ROM guidelines or normative values presented significant differences (p < 0.05). The EBI-5 system has exhibited good accuracy being paired to a photogrammetric system. The use of guidelines adjusted to age constitute an alternative to the use of the AMA cervical ROM guidelines. Professionals should use age-normalized guidelines as an alternative to the AMA guidelines.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Designs, Periodo: 3, Volumen: 4, Número: 4, Página inicial: 1, Página final: 19es_ES
dc.subject.otherBienestar, salud y sociedades_ES
dc.titleProposal of an Alternative to the AMA Guidelines for the Evaluation of the Cervical ROMes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordsacelerómetro, rango de movimientoes-ES
dc.keywordscervical spine; AMA; normative data; range of motion; traffic injuries; accelerometryen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España