Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Pros and cons of using “breakout rooms” in postgraduate online studies
dc.contributor.author | Pinilla Arbex, Javier | es-ES |
dc.contributor.author | Reher Díez, Guillermo Sven | es-ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-22T09:10:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-22T09:10:12Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11531/64048 | |
dc.description.abstract | es-ES | |
dc.description.abstract | This study indicates that breakout rooms are a useful tool for online teaching, since they successfully emulate in-class group activities. Students consider them to meet educational needs in lieu of face-to-face interaction. Their success, however, hinges on the definition of clear-cut goals in order to provide a semblance of structure, and ward off any possible slacking due to lack of motivation and engagement. In any case, they are not adequate substitutes for their in-class counterparts, and are also, at times, less satisfactory than class debates. Further data is needed to ascertain whether there are optimal class-sizes and education levels for these type of activities. | en-GB |
dc.format.mimetype | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | en-GB | es_ES |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ | es_ES |
dc.title | Pros and cons of using “breakout rooms” in postgraduate online studies | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper | es_ES |
dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/draft | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | es_ES | |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.keywords | es-ES | |
dc.keywords | en-GB |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
Documentos de Trabajo
WorkingPaper, ponencias invitadas y contribuciones en congresos no publicadas