Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Balancing fit and parsimony to improve Q-matrix validation
dc.contributor.author | Nájera Álvarez, Pablo | es-ES |
dc.contributor.author | Sorrel, Miguel A. | es-ES |
dc.contributor.author | de la Torre, Jimmy | es-ES |
dc.contributor.author | Abad, Francisco J. | es-ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-12T09:03:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-12T09:03:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-07-01 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0007-1102 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12228 | es_ES |
dc.description | Artículos en revistas | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | . | es-ES |
dc.description.abstract | The Q-matrix identifies the subset of attributes measured by each item in the cognitivediagnosis modelling framework. Usually constructed by domain experts, the Q-matrixmight contain some misspecifications, disrupting classification accuracy. Empirical Q-matrix validation methods such as thegeneral discrimination index(GDI) and Wald haveshown promising results in addressing this problem. However, a cut-off point is used inboth methods, which might be suboptimal. To address this limitation, the Hull method isproposed and evaluated in thepresent study. This method aims to find theoptimal balancebetween fit and parsimony, and it is flexible enough to be used either with a measure ofitem discrimination (theproportion of variance accounted for, PVAF) or a coefficient ofdetermination (pseudo-R2). Results from a simulation study showed that the Hull methodconsistently showed the best performance and shortest computation time, especiallywhen used with the PVAF. The Wald method also performed very well overall, while theGDI method obtained poor results when the number of attributes was high. The absenceof a cut-off point provides greater flexibility to the Hull method, and it places it as acomprehensive solution to the Q-matrix specification problem in applied settings. Thisproposal is illustrated using real data. | en-GB |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | en-GB | es_ES |
dc.rights | Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España | es_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ | es_ES |
dc.source | Revista: British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, Periodo: 3, Volumen: 74, Número: S1, Página inicial: 110, Página final: 130 | es_ES |
dc.title | Balancing fit and parsimony to improve Q-matrix validation | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | es_ES | |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
dc.keywords | . | es-ES |
dc.keywords | Q-matrix Cognitive diagnosis modeling Empirical validation methods Hull method Classification accuracy | en-GB |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
Artículos
Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.