Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorNicolas, Victor Luis dees-ES
dc.contributor.authorCazorla, Adolfoes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-23T08:19:49Z
dc.date.available2023-10-23T08:19:49Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-03es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/84185
dc.descriptionCapítulos en libroses_ES
dc.description.abstractIt is impossible to talk about planning as a scientific meta-discipline without mentioning one of the most influential worldwide figures in the second half of the twentieth century: John Friedmann. His contribution to the planning concept on his Planning as Social Learning theory is still very relevant. This paper shows the intellectual connection between Friedmann, Angel Ramos and Ignacio Trueba, two of the Spanish intellectual drivers in the engineering project knowledge area, who contributed to the foundation of the Project Engineering Spanish Association. The three of them share a broad vision of the project and abandon the “blue print” planning model. They also see the project as a transformational tool that requires a different planning style to the one which prevailed in the 70s—both in public and private domains. They were pioneers in structuring Knowledge/Action in a different way, both in academic institutions where disciples helped to bring about change—and with direct action via projects.es-ES
dc.description.abstractIt is impossible to talk about planning as a scientific meta-discipline without mentioning one of the most influential worldwide figures in the second half of the twentieth century: John Friedmann. His contribution to the planning concept on his Planning as Social Learning theory is still very relevant. This paper shows the intellectual connection between Friedmann, Angel Ramos and Ignacio Trueba, two of the Spanish intellectual drivers in the engineering project knowledge area, who contributed to the foundation of the Project Engineering Spanish Association. The three of them share a broad vision of the project and abandon the “blue print” planning model. They also see the project as a transformational tool that requires a different planning style to the one which prevailed in the 70s—both in public and private domains. They were pioneers in structuring Knowledge/Action in a different way, both in academic institutions where disciples helped to bring about change—and with direct action via projects.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoes-ESes_ES
dc.publisherSpringer (Zurich, Suiza)es_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.sourceLibro: Project management and engineering research, Página inicial: 277, Página final: 290es_ES
dc.titlePlanning and Projects: Three Visionaires Friedmann, J., Trueba, I. and Ramos, Aes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartes_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderembargoes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses_ES
dc.keywordsProjects Planning, social learning Knowledge/action Three visionarieses-ES
dc.keywordsProjects Planning, social learning Knowledge/action Three visionariesen-GB


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

  • Artículos
    Artículos de revista, capítulos de libro y contribuciones en congresos publicadas.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem