Critical thinking predicts reductions in Spanish physicians’ stress levels and promotes fake news detection
Abstract
. The prevalence of pseudoscientific beliefs and fake news increased during the coronavirus crisis.
Misinformation streams such as these potentially pose risks to people’s health. Thus, knowing
how these pseudoscientific beliefs and fake news impact the community of internists may be
useful for improving primary care services. In this research, analyses of stress levels, effectiveness
in detecting fake news, use of critical thinking (CP), and attitudes toward pseudosciences in in
ternists during the COVID-19 crisis were performed. A total of 1129 internists participated.
Several multiple regression models were applied using the forward stepwise method to determine
the weight of CP and physicians’ attitudes toward pseudosciences in predicting reductions in
stress levels and facilitating the detection of fake news. The use of critical thinking predicted
46.9% of the reduction in stress levels. Similarly, skeptical attitudes and critical thinking pre
dicted 56.1% of the hits on fake news detection tests. The stress levels of physicians during the
coronavirus pandemic were clinically significant. The efficacy of fake news detection increases by
30.7% if the individual was a physician. Study outcomes indicate that the use of critical thinking
and skeptical attitudes reduce stress levels and allow better detection of fake news. The impor
tance of how to promote critical and skeptical attitudes in the field of medicine is discussed.
Critical thinking predicts reductions in Spanish physicians’ stress levels and promotes fake news detection
Tipo de Actividad
Artículos en revistasISSN
1871-1871Palabras Clave
.Critical thinking Fake news Stress levels Pseudosciences Coronavirus Internal Medicine