Keywords
Arbitraje deportivo, tutela judicial, Derecho de la Unión, laudo arbitral, orden público, control jurisdiccional, Sports arbitration, judicial protection, European Union law, arbitral award, public policy, judicial review
Asunto Seraing: control jurisdiccional del laudo arbitral
Abstract
El comentario analiza la sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea de 1 de agosto de 2025 en el asunto Seraing, relativa al control jurisdiccional de los laudos arbitrales deportivos. El Tribunal establece que los Estados miembros no pueden reconocer plenos efectos jurídicos a laudos controlados exclusivamente por tribunales de terceros Estados cuando ello impida una tutela judicial efectiva respecto del Derecho de la Unión. El trabajo examina especialmente la fuerza de cosa juzgada y el valor probatorio de estos laudos, así como las exigencias derivadas de los artículos 19 TUE, 47 de la Carta y 267 TFUE. Concluye destacando que la autonomía del arbitraje encuentra su límite en la autonomía del Derecho de la Unión y en la necesaria protección de su orden público.
The commentary analyses the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 1 August 2025 in the Seraing case, concerning judicial review of sports arbitration awards. The Court establishes that Member States cannot grant full legal effects to awards reviewed exclusively by courts of third countries when this prevents effective judicial protection regarding European Union law. The paper focuses particularly on the res judicata effect and evidentiary value of such awards, as well as on the requirements arising from Article 19 TEU, Article 47 of the Charter and Article 267 TFEU. It concludes that the autonomy of arbitration is limited by the autonomy of EU law and by the need to ensure effective judicial review of principles and provisions forming part of the public policy of the European Union.
The commentary analyses the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 1 August 2025 in the Seraing case, concerning judicial review of sports arbitration awards. The Court establishes that Member States cannot grant full legal effects to awards reviewed exclusively by courts of third countries when this prevents effective judicial protection regarding European Union law. The paper focuses particularly on the res judicata effect and evidentiary value of such awards, as well as on the requirements arising from Article 19 TEU, Article 47 of the Charter and Article 267 TFEU. It concludes that the autonomy of arbitration is limited by the autonomy of EU law and by the need to ensure effective judicial review of principles and provisions forming part of the public policy of the European Union.
Información detallada
Materias, derechos, colecciones e identificadores