Keywords
data protection, right to be forgotten, extraterritoriality, GDPR, freedom of expression, international jurisdiction, comparative law
La (extra)territorialidad del derecho a la protección de datos: el alcance del derecho al olvido
Abstract
El capítulo examina el alcance territorial del derecho al olvido en el marco del Reglamento General de Protección de Datos (RGPD) de la Unión Europea. A partir del caso Google v. CNIL, los autores analizan la tensión entre la territorialidad del derecho internacional y la expansión normativa de la UE en materia de protección de datos. El estudio revisa distintos enfoques teóricos y comparados, destacando cómo diversos tribunales en Europa y otros países abordan la extraterritorialidad y las órdenes globales de supresión. Se concluye que la delimitación territorial del derecho al olvido debe basarse en un análisis caso por caso, atendiendo al equilibrio entre privacidad, libertad de expresión y competencia judicial internacional.
This chapter explores the territorial scope of the right to be forgotten under the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Using the Google v. CNIL case as a starting point, the authors analyze the tension between international law’s principle of territoriality and the EU’s expansive approach to data protection. The study compares theoretical and judicial approaches, including international case law addressing global delisting orders and extraterritoriality. It concludes that defining the territorial reach of the right to be forgotten requires a case-by-case assessment balancing privacy, freedom of expression, and judicial competence. The authors argue for a prudent application of global deletion orders to prevent conflicts of jurisdiction and preserve legal coherence in cross-border data protection..
This chapter explores the territorial scope of the right to be forgotten under the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Using the Google v. CNIL case as a starting point, the authors analyze the tension between international law’s principle of territoriality and the EU’s expansive approach to data protection. The study compares theoretical and judicial approaches, including international case law addressing global delisting orders and extraterritoriality. It concludes that defining the territorial reach of the right to be forgotten requires a case-by-case assessment balancing privacy, freedom of expression, and judicial competence. The authors argue for a prudent application of global deletion orders to prevent conflicts of jurisdiction and preserve legal coherence in cross-border data protection..
Información detallada
Materias, derechos, colecciones e identificadores