Keywords
K2N, Cooperación, institucionalización, FAO, OMC, sostenibilidad, pesca INDNR., Cooperation, institutionalization, FAO, WTO, sustainability, IUU fishing.
Economia Politica Internacional, Economia y Politica, Relaciones Internacionales, Globalizacion.
Abstract
La pesca ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada (INDNR) representa una grave amenaza para la sostenibilidad en el sector pesquero. Este estudio analiza la cooperación entre la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO) y la Organización Mundial del Comercio (OMC) en la lucha contra la pesca INDNR. Se evalúa cómo la institucionalización y legalización de estas organizaciones influyen en la implementación de políticas. La hipótesis central es que la OMC, con su estructura regulada y capacidad de imponer sanciones, puede ser más efectiva que la FAO en asegurar el cumplimiento de las regulaciones y promover la sostenibilidad pesquera.
La FAO, con su enfoque técnico y normativo, ha promovido diversas directrices y acuerdos internacionales, como el Acuerdo sobre medidas del Estado rector del puerto. Por otro lado, la OMC ha influido a través de la regulación del comercio internacional y las sanciones comerciales. Se revisan las estrategias, políticas y acciones implementadas por la FAO y la OMC, comparando su nivel de legalización y su impacto efectivo en la reducción de la pesca INDNR.
Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing represents a serious threat to sustainability in the fisheries sector. This study analyses the cooperation between the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) in the fight against IUU fishing. It assesses how the institutionalization and legalization of these organizations influence policy implementation. The central hypothesis is that the WTO, with its regulatory structure and capacity to impose sanctions, may be more effective than FAO in ensuring compliance with regulations and promoting sustainable fisheries. FAO, with its technical and normative approach, has promoted a number of international guidelines and agreements, such as the Agreement on Port State Measures. On the other hand, the WTO has been influential through international trade regulation and trade sanctions. The strategies, policies and actions implemented by FAO and WTO are reviewed, comparing their level of legalisation and their effective impact on reducing IUU fishing.
Illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing represents a serious threat to sustainability in the fisheries sector. This study analyses the cooperation between the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) in the fight against IUU fishing. It assesses how the institutionalization and legalization of these organizations influence policy implementation. The central hypothesis is that the WTO, with its regulatory structure and capacity to impose sanctions, may be more effective than FAO in ensuring compliance with regulations and promoting sustainable fisheries. FAO, with its technical and normative approach, has promoted a number of international guidelines and agreements, such as the Agreement on Port State Measures. On the other hand, the WTO has been influential through international trade regulation and trade sanctions. The strategies, policies and actions implemented by FAO and WTO are reviewed, comparing their level of legalisation and their effective impact on reducing IUU fishing.
Información detallada
Materias, derechos, colecciones e identificadores
URI / Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/11531/79134Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States