Keywords
ética, nuevas antropologías, ontología trinitaria, poliamor, relación dogmática-praxis, sexualidad, teología queer, dogmatic-praxis relationship, ethics, new anthropologies, polyamory, queer theology, sexuality, trinitarian ontology.
No hay amor sin tres: La metafísica trinitaria del tercero frente al desafío del poliamor
Abstract
La ontología o metafísica trinitaria ilumina, a partir de las relaciones intradivinas, nuestra praxis sobre el amor en todas sus facetas: amistad, deseo erótico-sexual, esponsalidad, fraternidad cívica y eclesial, etc. Este trabajo hace frente principalmente al desafío del “poliamor”, cuyo discurso a veces se mal interpreta como semejante a la teología trinitaria. El poliamor es un síntoma reactivo del “amor romántico” que se define por una sexualización del amor humano similar a la de algunas ideas pseudomísticas. Por ello, debe operarse una desexualización del misterio divino. Como respuesta acudimos a la perspectiva de la amistad trinitaria explicando el significado del paradigma trinitario amical del tercero, el condilectus (Ricardo de San Víctor). Por otro lado, se explicitan las visiones del amor tácitas en algunas concepciones heréticas sobre Dios. Desde el paradigma del tercero, se esbozan unos principios antropológico-trinitarios básicos para comprender los lazos fraternos convivenciales y el amor conyugal.
Trinitarian ontology or metaphysics provides a light, based on intradivine relations, on our praxis of love in all its facets: friendship, erotic-sexual desire, espousal, civic and ecclesial fraternity, etc. This work mainly addresses the challenge of ‘polyamory’, whose discourse is sometimes misinterpreted as akin to Trinitarian theology. Polyamory is a reac-tive symptom of ‘romantic love’ which is defined by a sexualisation of human love similar to that of some pseudo-mystical ideas. Therefore, a desexualisation of the God's mystery must take place. In response, we turn to the perspective of Trinitarian friendship, explai-ning the meaning of the Trinitarian paradigm of ‘the third’ (person), the condilectus (Ri-chard of St. Victor). On the other hand, the visions of love implicit in some heretical con-ceptions of God are made explicit. From the paradigm of the third, some basic anthropo-logical-trinitarian principles are outlined to understand the fraternal bonds of conviviality and conjugal love.
Trinitarian ontology or metaphysics provides a light, based on intradivine relations, on our praxis of love in all its facets: friendship, erotic-sexual desire, espousal, civic and ecclesial fraternity, etc. This work mainly addresses the challenge of ‘polyamory’, whose discourse is sometimes misinterpreted as akin to Trinitarian theology. Polyamory is a reac-tive symptom of ‘romantic love’ which is defined by a sexualisation of human love similar to that of some pseudo-mystical ideas. Therefore, a desexualisation of the God's mystery must take place. In response, we turn to the perspective of Trinitarian friendship, explai-ning the meaning of the Trinitarian paradigm of ‘the third’ (person), the condilectus (Ri-chard of St. Victor). On the other hand, the visions of love implicit in some heretical con-ceptions of God are made explicit. From the paradigm of the third, some basic anthropo-logical-trinitarian principles are outlined to understand the fraternal bonds of conviviality and conjugal love.
Información detallada
Materias, derechos, colecciones e identificadores
URI / Handle
https://doi.org/10.36576/2660-955X.71.217Rights
Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España