Keywords
Poder judicial, Covid 19, estado de alarma, derechos fundamentales, Judicial Branch, Covid 19, state of alarm, fundamental rights.
Limitación de derechos fundamentales y tutela judicial en tiempos de pandemia
Abstract
En este capítulo se presenta la repercusión que ha tenido la actividad
del Poder Judicial como garantía de los derechos fundamentales ante los actos del
Gobierno estatal o de las Comunidades Autónomas que suponían una limitación de
los derechos fundamentales durante la declaración del estado de alarma a raíz de
la pandemia. Igualmente se analiza la interrupción del normal funcionamiento del
Poder Judicial durante el estado de alarma, y, la reforma de la Ley 3/2020, de 18 de
septiembre, de medidas procesales y organizativas para hacer frente al Covid-19 en
el ámbito de la administración de justicia que fue declarada inconstitucional, pues
en palabras del Tribunal Constitucional dicha reforma suponía “una inconstitucional conmixtión” entre el Poder Ejecutivo y el Poder Judicial
This chapter presents the repercussion that the activity of the Judiciary has had as a guarantee of fundamental rights in the face of acts of the State Government or of the Autonomous Communities that implied a limitation of fundamental rights during the declaration of the state of alarm as a result of the pandemic. Likewise, the interruption of the normal functioning of the Judiciary during the state of alarm is analyzed, and the reform of Law 3/2020, of September 18, on procedural and organizational measures to deal with Covid-19 in the field of administration of justice that was declared unconstitutional, since in the words of the Constitutional Court said reform supposed “an unconstitutional mixture” between the Executive Power and the Judicial Power.
This chapter presents the repercussion that the activity of the Judiciary has had as a guarantee of fundamental rights in the face of acts of the State Government or of the Autonomous Communities that implied a limitation of fundamental rights during the declaration of the state of alarm as a result of the pandemic. Likewise, the interruption of the normal functioning of the Judiciary during the state of alarm is analyzed, and the reform of Law 3/2020, of September 18, on procedural and organizational measures to deal with Covid-19 in the field of administration of justice that was declared unconstitutional, since in the words of the Constitutional Court said reform supposed “an unconstitutional mixture” between the Executive Power and the Judicial Power.
Información detallada
Materias, derechos, colecciones e identificadores