Subjects
56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho
5605 Legislación y leyes nacionales
560505 Derecho penal
El tratamiento jurisprudencial del delito de prevaricación y las cuestiones que suscita : un análisis del artículo 404 del Código Penal
Abstract
A
través
del
presente
trabajo
se
busca
llevar
a
cabo
un
análisis
tanto
desde
un
punto
de
vista
doctrinal
como
jurisprudencial
del
Artículo
404
del
Código
Penal
de
1995,
desmenuzando
el
precepto
término
a
término
para
analizar
individualmente
cada
uno
de
ellos:
la
autoridad
o
funcionario
público,
la
resolución
arbitraria
a
sabiendas
de
su
injusticia,
así
como
la
pena
que
se
impone.
Una
vez
realizada
la
tarea
de
dotar
de
significado
práctico
al
artículo,
planteamos
aquellas
cuestiones
que
surgen
del
ejercicio
anterior,
tratando
de
clarificarlas
a
través
de
las
teorías
doctrinales
y
de
la
jurisprudencia
existente:
la
participación
de
terceros
ajenos
a
la
Administración
pública,
la
posibilidad
de
doble
sanción
penal-‐administrativa,
la
preeminencia
del
orden
penal
sobre
el
administrativo,
la
posibilidad
de
comisión
por
omisión
y
la
responsabilidad
patrimonial
de
la
Administración
derivada
de
una
conducta
prevaricadora
de
un
funcionario
público.
Throughout this work we analyse the crime of administrative malfeasance, from a doctrinal and case-‐law perspective, contained in the Art. 404 of the Spanish Criminal Code of 1995. To that end, we crumble the rule in order to analyse each of the terms it contains: the authority or civil servant, the arbitrary resolution knowing the injustice, as well as the penalty applied. This done, we suggest those questions arising from the above, trying to clarify them through the doctrinal theories and the existing jurisprudence: the participation of third-‐party not related to the Administration, the possibility of double punishment administrative and criminal, the preeminence of the criminal jurisdiction, the possibility of commission by omission and the financial liability of the Public Administration caused by a criminal doing of a civil servant.
Throughout this work we analyse the crime of administrative malfeasance, from a doctrinal and case-‐law perspective, contained in the Art. 404 of the Spanish Criminal Code of 1995. To that end, we crumble the rule in order to analyse each of the terms it contains: the authority or civil servant, the arbitrary resolution knowing the injustice, as well as the penalty applied. This done, we suggest those questions arising from the above, trying to clarify them through the doctrinal theories and the existing jurisprudence: the participation of third-‐party not related to the Administration, the possibility of double punishment administrative and criminal, the preeminence of the criminal jurisdiction, the possibility of commission by omission and the financial liability of the Public Administration caused by a criminal doing of a civil servant.
Información detallada
Materias, derechos, colecciones e identificadores
Keywords
Prevaricación administrativa, Art. 404 CP, Doctrina, Jurisprudencia, Tribunal Supremo, Autoridad, Funcionario público, Resolución, Acto administrativo, Injusticia, Arbitrariedad, Inhabilitación especial, Participación de terceros, Comisión por omisión, Non bis in ídem, Potestad sancionadora, Administración Pública, Responsabilidad patrimonial, Principio de mínima intervención penal, Administrative malfeasance, Art. 404 of Spanish Criminal Code, Doctrine, Case-law, Spanish Supreme Court, Authority, Civil servant, Resolution, Administrative act, Injustice, Arbitrariness, Special disqualification, Third-party participation, Financial liability, Non bis in ídem, Sanctionatng power, Public Administration