Keywords
Monotelismo, monoenergismo, III Constantinopla, humanidad de Cristo, salvación, Ratzinger., .Monothelitism, Monoenergism, III Constantinople, humanity of Christ, salvation, Ratzinger
Getsemaní según Ratzinger, Sergio de Constantinopla y Máximo el Confesor. La postura de Ratzinger a debate
Abstract
Se analiza la comprensión de Ratzinger sobre las voluntades de Cristo en Getsemaní, detectando una comprensión claramente monotelita: una única voluntad de la persona. Se constata su cercanía con textos monotelitas como el «pacto de unión», el Pséphos de Sergio de Constantinopla y la Ekthesis. Se contrastan todos estos puntos de vista con Máximo el Confesor, a quien Ratzinger dice seguir. Se concluye con una valoración en la que se muestra una posible alternativa desde Ratzinger para superar su monotelismo.
Ratzinger's understanding of the will of Christ in Gethsemane is analyzed, detecting a clearly Monothelite understanding: one only will of the person. His closeness to Monothelite texts such as the “covenant of union”, the Pséphos of Sergius of Constantinople and the Ekthesis is noted. All these points of view are contrasted with Maximus the Confessor, whom Ratzinger claims to follow. It concludes with an assessment showing a possible alternative from Ratzinger to overcome his monothelitism.
Ratzinger's understanding of the will of Christ in Gethsemane is analyzed, detecting a clearly Monothelite understanding: one only will of the person. His closeness to Monothelite texts such as the “covenant of union”, the Pséphos of Sergius of Constantinople and the Ekthesis is noted. All these points of view are contrasted with Maximus the Confessor, whom Ratzinger claims to follow. It concludes with an assessment showing a possible alternative from Ratzinger to overcome his monothelitism.
Información detallada
Materias, derechos, colecciones e identificadores