Keywords
.Das Nichtige Teología de la crisis Opus alienum Antropomorfización Exclusivismo cristológico, Das Nichtige Theology of crisis Opus alienum Anthropomorphization Christological exclusivism
Dios y la Nada: exposición crítica del pensamiento de Karl Barth
Abstract
.El ensayo "Dios y la Nada", de Pedro Castelao, analiza y critica el pensamiento de Karl Barth sobre la relación entre Dios y "das Nichtige" (la Nada). Barth conceptualiza la Nada como una entidad activa y opuesta a Dios, distinta de la creación y el pecado, que amenaza la armonía del universo. Este "das Nichtige" no es simplemente ausencia, sino un poder anulador que Barth relaciona con el rechazo de Dios en su opus alienum.
Castelao elogia la coherencia sistemática de Barth y su énfasis en el carácter fragmentario del discurso teológico. Sin embargo, critica su tendencia a una especulación excesiva y antropomorfización de la voluntad divina. También cuestiona el exclusivismo cristológico de Barth, que limita el entendimiento del mal y la Nada exclusivamente a Jesucristo.
Además, el autor señala un riesgo quasi-gnóstico en la conceptualización de la Nada y la vincula a ideas especulativas de la filosofía alemana. Castelao concluye que Barth, aunque sugerente, no resuelve satisfactoriamente las contradicciones en torno al mal, la elección divina y la salvación, dejando abierta la cuestión de si su concepción logra superar la sombra de la fractura inherente al discurso teológico.
.The essay "Dios y la Nada" by Pedro Castelao examines and critiques Karl Barth's thought on the relationship between God and "das Nichtige" (the Nothingness). Barth conceptualizes the Nothingness as an active entity opposing God, distinct from creation and sin, and as a nullifying power related to God's rejection in his opus alienum. Castelao praises Barth’s systematic coherence and his emphasis on the fragmentary nature of theological discourse. However, he critiques Barth’s tendency toward excessive speculation and the anthropomorphization of divine will. He also questions Barth’s Christological exclusivism, which confines the understanding of evil and the Nothingness solely to Jesus Christ. Moreover, the author highlights a quasi-gnostic risk in Barth’s conceptualization of Nothingness, linking it to speculative German philosophy. Castelao concludes that while Barth’s approach is compelling, it fails to satisfactorily resolve contradictions surrounding evil, divine choice, and salvation. This leaves open the question of whether Barth’s conception truly overcomes the shadow of the fracture inherent in theological discourse.
.The essay "Dios y la Nada" by Pedro Castelao examines and critiques Karl Barth's thought on the relationship between God and "das Nichtige" (the Nothingness). Barth conceptualizes the Nothingness as an active entity opposing God, distinct from creation and sin, and as a nullifying power related to God's rejection in his opus alienum. Castelao praises Barth’s systematic coherence and his emphasis on the fragmentary nature of theological discourse. However, he critiques Barth’s tendency toward excessive speculation and the anthropomorphization of divine will. He also questions Barth’s Christological exclusivism, which confines the understanding of evil and the Nothingness solely to Jesus Christ. Moreover, the author highlights a quasi-gnostic risk in Barth’s conceptualization of Nothingness, linking it to speculative German philosophy. Castelao concludes that while Barth’s approach is compelling, it fails to satisfactorily resolve contradictions surrounding evil, divine choice, and salvation. This leaves open the question of whether Barth’s conception truly overcomes the shadow of the fracture inherent in theological discourse.
Información detallada
Materias, derechos, colecciones e identificadores