Subjects
56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho
5605 Legislación y leyes nacionales
560503 Derecho mercantil
Jurisprudencia del Tribunal Supremo en materia concursal
Abstract
En los últimos años la Sala Primera del Tribunal Supremo en materia concursal ha dictado un importante elenco de doctrina jurisprudencial sobre aspectos bastante controvertidos y muy abiertos, tanto en materia sustantiva como procesal. Esta jurisprudencia ha servido como complemento al ordenamiento jurídico para ciertos aspectos que no estaban resueltos y que generaban soluciones distintas dependiendo del juzgado y audiencia que los trataban.
La metodología empleada para el desarrollo de este trabajo ha consistido en recabar sentencias recientes sobre los temas más controvertidos que se dan hoy en día en el derecho concursal, así como las problemáticas que suscitan diversas interpretaciones de la norma por parte de jueces, magistrados, administradores concursales, notarios, registradores y abogados. Para ello llevé a cabo la lectura del libro Fundamentos De Derecho Empresarial (3.a ed., Vol. 4) para adquirir unos conocimientos básicos y recogí información de artículos, sentencias y revistas jurídicas.
Con este trabajo se busca aclarar estos temas tan controvertidos mediante la realización de un estudio analítico de la jurisprudencia más relevante del Tribunal Supremo que resuelve la polémica suscitada por la ambigüedad de las resoluciones y opiniones de la doctrina y jurisprudencia menor.
In recent years, the First Chamber of the Supreme Court in bankruptcy matters has issued an important list of jurisprudence on quite controversial and very open aspects, both in substantive and procedural matters. This jurisprudence has served as a complement to the legal system for certain aspects that were not settled and which generated different solutions depending on the court and audience that dealt with them. The methodology used for the development of this project has consisted of collecting recent Supreme Court judgements on the most controversial issues that arise today in insolvency law, as well as the problems that arise from various interpretations of the law by judges, magistrates, insolvency administrators, notaries, registrars and lawyers. For this purpose, I read the book Fundamentos De Derecho Empresarial (3.a ed., Vol. 4) to acquire some basic knowledge and gathered information from articles, judgments and legal journals. This work seeks to clarify these controversial issues by conducting an analytical study of the most relevant Supreme Court jurisprudence that resolves the controversy caused by the ambiguity of the resolutions and opinions of the doctrine and minor jurisprudence.
In recent years, the First Chamber of the Supreme Court in bankruptcy matters has issued an important list of jurisprudence on quite controversial and very open aspects, both in substantive and procedural matters. This jurisprudence has served as a complement to the legal system for certain aspects that were not settled and which generated different solutions depending on the court and audience that dealt with them. The methodology used for the development of this project has consisted of collecting recent Supreme Court judgements on the most controversial issues that arise today in insolvency law, as well as the problems that arise from various interpretations of the law by judges, magistrates, insolvency administrators, notaries, registrars and lawyers. For this purpose, I read the book Fundamentos De Derecho Empresarial (3.a ed., Vol. 4) to acquire some basic knowledge and gathered information from articles, judgments and legal journals. This work seeks to clarify these controversial issues by conducting an analytical study of the most relevant Supreme Court jurisprudence that resolves the controversy caused by the ambiguity of the resolutions and opinions of the doctrine and minor jurisprudence.
Información detallada
Materias, derechos, colecciones e identificadores
Keywords
KDB, Jurisprudencia, Tribunal Supremo, Concurso de acreedores, Doctrina, Derecho Concursal, Jurisprudence, Supreme Court, Doctrine, Insolvency law, Bankruptcy
URI / Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/11531/38512Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States