Keywords
KDG, Prueba civil, proposición, admisión, Derecho Procesal, Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil., Civil evidence, proposition, admission, Procedural Law, Civil Procedure Law.
Proposición y admisión de los medios de prueba en el ámbito del proceso civil.
Abstract
Este trabajo analiza dos fases esenciales del proceso civil: la proposición y la admisión de los medios de prueba. Ambos trámites son determinantes para delimitar los hechos controvertidos, estructurar el proceso de forma equilibrada y garantizar el derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva.
El objetivo principal es examinar el régimen jurídico vigente, identificar posibles disfunciones en su aplicación práctica y formular propuestas de mejora que refuercen la seguridad jurídica y la coherencia del sistema. Para ello, se ha realizado una revisión exhaustiva de la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil, incorporando las reformas de 2023 y la prevista para 2025, así como un análisis doctrinal y jurisprudencial que permite contrastar distintas interpretaciones.
La investigación se organiza en tres bloques: un marco teórico y normativo general; un desarrollo centrado en la proposición, admisión y diligencias finales; y unas conclusiones donde se recogen los principales hallazgos y recomendaciones. Entre las principales aportaciones de este trabajo destaca el análisis de la forma en la que se resuelve la admisión de los medios de prueba, el tratamiento de la prueba ilícita y la posibilidad de que las partes renuncien a un medio de prueba antes de su práctica.
El trabajo busca ofrecer una visión crítica y útil sobre los trámites de proposición y admisión de los medios de prueba, con especial atención a su impacto práctico y su función en la protección de los derechos procesales.
This paper analyzes two essential phases of the civil process: the proposition and admission of evidence. Both formalities are decisive for delimiting the disputed facts, structuring the process in a balanced manner and guaranteeing the right to effective judicial protection. The main objective is to examine the current legal regime, identify possible dysfunctions in its practical application and formulate proposals for improvement to reinforce legal certainty and the coherence of the system. To this end, an exhaustive review of the Civil Procedure Law has been carried out, incorporating the reforms of 2023 and the one planned for 2025, as well as a doctrinal and jurisprudential analysis that allows different interpretations to be contrasted. The research is organized in three blocks: a general theoretical and normative framework; a development focused on the proposition, admission and final proceedings; and conclusions where the main findings and recommendations are gathered. Among the main contributions of this work is the analysis of the way in which the admission of evidence is resolved, the treatment of unlawful evidence and the possibility of the parties waiving a means of evidence before its practice. The work seeks to offer a critical and useful vision of the procedures for proposing and admitting evidence, with special attention to its practical impact and its function in the protection of procedural rights.
This paper analyzes two essential phases of the civil process: the proposition and admission of evidence. Both formalities are decisive for delimiting the disputed facts, structuring the process in a balanced manner and guaranteeing the right to effective judicial protection. The main objective is to examine the current legal regime, identify possible dysfunctions in its practical application and formulate proposals for improvement to reinforce legal certainty and the coherence of the system. To this end, an exhaustive review of the Civil Procedure Law has been carried out, incorporating the reforms of 2023 and the one planned for 2025, as well as a doctrinal and jurisprudential analysis that allows different interpretations to be contrasted. The research is organized in three blocks: a general theoretical and normative framework; a development focused on the proposition, admission and final proceedings; and conclusions where the main findings and recommendations are gathered. Among the main contributions of this work is the analysis of the way in which the admission of evidence is resolved, the treatment of unlawful evidence and the possibility of the parties waiving a means of evidence before its practice. The work seeks to offer a critical and useful vision of the procedures for proposing and admitting evidence, with special attention to its practical impact and its function in the protection of procedural rights.
Información detallada
Materias, derechos, colecciones e identificadores
URI / Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/11531/91251Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States