Subjects
56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho
5605 Legislación y leyes nacionales
560505 Derecho penal
Aspectos legislativos y jurisprudenciales de la Doctrina Parot
Abstract
El presente trabajo consiste en un análisis de los ámbitos tanto legislativo, como
jurisprudencial del principio y fin de la Doctrina Parot, la cual ha suscitado gran polémica y debate
jurídico debido a su principal efecto de alargamiento del tiempo en prisión de los penados incursos
en los supuestos en que a una persona se le imponen varias condenas. Siguiendo el orden
cronológico de la sucesión de los acontecimientos se analizan principalmente, la Sentencia del Pleno
del Tribunal Supremo nº 197/2006, de 28 de Febrero, que supuso un radical cambio de criterio
frente a lo que constituía práctica constante dando lugar a la Doctrina Parot, y la posterior Sentencia
del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos del pasado 21 de Octubre de 2013, que puso fin a la
misma, cuestionando la doctrina jurisprudencial y constitucional española sobre el principio de
legalidad. Finalmente, se exponen una serie de conclusiones a propósito de esta última Sentencia, así
como una breve referencia a su ejecución, y una reflexión final.
This investigation is aimed at the analysis of the Parot Doctrine at a legal and jurisprudential level, studying its origins and end, due to the great polemics and legal debate it has given rise to. The debate arises due to the main effect it has on making longer the imprisonment time of those that are charged with more than one sentence. Following the chronological sequence of events occurred, the investigation focuses mainly on the study of the Sentence of the Supreme Court, nº 197/2006, 28th of February –which represents an inflection point with regard to how things were being dealt with until then, giving rise to the referred Parot Doctrine-, and later on the Sentence of the European Human Rights Court, 21st October 2013 –Sentence that ended this Doctrine, pointing out and questioning the Spanish jurisprudential and constitutional doctrine regarding the principle of legality. Finally, the investigation reaches some conclusions with respect to the last mentioned Sentence, making as well a brief remark about its execution, and ending with a final global consideration.
This investigation is aimed at the analysis of the Parot Doctrine at a legal and jurisprudential level, studying its origins and end, due to the great polemics and legal debate it has given rise to. The debate arises due to the main effect it has on making longer the imprisonment time of those that are charged with more than one sentence. Following the chronological sequence of events occurred, the investigation focuses mainly on the study of the Sentence of the Supreme Court, nº 197/2006, 28th of February –which represents an inflection point with regard to how things were being dealt with until then, giving rise to the referred Parot Doctrine-, and later on the Sentence of the European Human Rights Court, 21st October 2013 –Sentence that ended this Doctrine, pointing out and questioning the Spanish jurisprudential and constitutional doctrine regarding the principle of legality. Finally, the investigation reaches some conclusions with respect to the last mentioned Sentence, making as well a brief remark about its execution, and ending with a final global consideration.
Información detallada
Materias, derechos, colecciones e identificadores
Keywords
Doctrina Parot, Beneficios penitenciarios, Acumulación de penas, Principio de legalidad, Principio de libertad, TS, TEDH, Jurisprudencia, Legislación, Parot Doctrine, Penitentiary benefits, Accumulation of penalties, Principle of legality, Principle of liberty, Supreme Court, European Human Rights Court, Jurisprudence, Legislation