Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/103100
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRevuelta Aramburu, Martaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorMorales Polo, Carloses-ES
dc.contributor.authorSantos Montes, Ana Maríaes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-01T07:01:39Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-01T07:01:39Z-
dc.date.issued2025-12-31es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2190-4707es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps:doi.org10.1186s12302-025-01183-wes_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/103100-
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractes-ES
dc.description.abstractThis study presents a comprehensive environmental impact assessment of biofertilizers from digestate in Spain’s 23 most extensive food markets using life cycle analysis. Eleven impact categories were evaluated. Results revealed significant variations in impacts across food markets, primarily due to differences in infrastructure sizing and energy self-sufficiency. Markets with appropriately sized anaerobic digestion facilities and energy self-sufficiency demonstrated significant environmental benefits, resulting in emission savings in 9 of the 11 impact categories assessed, except acidification and eutrophication. As a representative case of the markets with properly sized anaerobic digestion infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency, Market G as a representative market achieved up to 86 reduction in abiotic depletion and over 75 in toxicity categories. However, four food markets with either oversized or undersized infrastructure exhibited lower benefits, with Market A showing no advantages over synthetic fertilizers. In addition, the acidification and eutrophication categories posed challenges for all markets due to ammonia emissions during composting; in these impact categories, the values of biofertilizers are 5 to 8 times higher, depending on the market. When comparing unit and aggregate values (single scores), 19 out of 23 markets offer environmentally sustainable biofertilizers, resulting in an average emission savings of 55. In conclusion, biofertilizers present a more sustainable alternative to synthetic fertilizers in most markets, contingent on adequate infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency. Future studies should focus on optimizing facility sizing and evaluating the influence of waste composition, as both factors significantly affect the environmental performance of digestate-based biofertilizers. This research highlights the potential of biofertilizers to contribute to more sustainable agricultural practices when the production process is well-optimized.  en-GB
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Environmental Sciences Europe, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: , Página inicial: 134-1, Página final: 134-15es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleDigestate from Spanish wholesale food markets: valorization as biofertilizer and analysis of environmental impacts compared to synthetic fertilizerses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordses-ES
dc.keywordsAnaerobic digestion, Digestate, Biofertilizer, Impact assessment, Waste valorization, Nutrient management.en-GB
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
IIT-25-269R1,57 MBUnknownVisualizar/Abrir
IIT-25-269R_preview3,94 kBUnknownVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.