Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/11531/35779Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | González Romero, Isaac Camilo | es-ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Wogrin, Sonja | es-ES |
| dc.contributor.author | Gómez San Román, Tomás | es-ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-13T04:10:43Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-03-13T04:10:43Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-04-01 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2211-467X | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.02.006 | es_ES |
| dc.description | Artículos en revistas | es_ES |
| dc.description.abstract | Under the current European market environment, transmission companies have to decide network expansion by maximizing social welfare. However, generation companies (GENCOs) decide their capacity expansion with the aim of maximizing their own profit. This process, in addition to the increasing penetration of renewable energy, storage and distributed generation, might represent a rupture between short and long-term signals. Therefore, this paper proposes a bi-level formulation for the generation and transmission coordination problem (GEPTEP). We consider a proactive framework in which a centralized TSO represents the upper level while the decentralized GENCOs, that trade in the market, represent the lower level. As a novel feature, an enhanced representative period framework is employed, which allows us to consider operation in both short and long-term storage technologies. A case study is presented to compare the results between perfect and imperfect competition in the market. | es-ES |
| dc.description.abstract | Under the current European market environment, transmission companies have to decide network expansion by maximizing social welfare. However, generation companies (GENCOs) decide their capacity expansion with the aim of maximizing their own profit. This process, in addition to the increasing penetration of renewable energy, storage and distributed generation, might represent a rupture between short and long-term signals. Therefore, this paper proposes a bi-level formulation for the generation and transmission coordination problem (GEPTEP). We consider a proactive framework in which a centralized TSO represents the upper level while the decentralized GENCOs, that trade in the market, represent the lower level. As a novel feature, an enhanced representative period framework is employed, which allows us to consider operation in both short and long-term storage technologies. A case study is presented to compare the results between perfect and imperfect competition in the market. | en-GB |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | en-GB | es_ES |
| dc.source | Revista: Energy Strategy Reviews, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: , Página inicial: 154, Página final: 165 | es_ES |
| dc.subject.other | Instituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT) | es_ES |
| dc.title | Proactive transmission expansion planning with storage considerations | es_ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
| dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
| dc.rights.holder | es_ES | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_ES |
| dc.keywords | Proactive; Bi-level; Strategic; ransmission expansion; Generation expansion; Storage | es-ES |
| dc.keywords | Proactive; Bi-level; Strategic; ransmission expansion; Generation expansion; Storage | en-GB |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
| Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IIT-19-021A.pdf | 2,91 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() Visualizar/Abrir | |
| IIT-19-021A | 2,91 MB | Unknown | Visualizar/Abrir | |
| IIT-19-021A | 2,91 MB | Unknown | Visualizar/Abrir |
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.
