Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/35779
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Romero, Isaac Camiloes-ES
dc.contributor.authorWogrin, Sonjaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorGómez San Román, Tomáses-ES
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-13T04:10:43Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-13T04:10:43Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2211-467Xes_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.02.006es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractUnder the current European market environment, transmission companies have to decide network expansion by maximizing social welfare. However, generation companies (GENCOs) decide their capacity expansion with the aim of maximizing their own profit. This process, in addition to the increasing penetration of renewable energy, storage and distributed generation, might represent a rupture between short and long-term signals. Therefore, this paper proposes a bi-level formulation for the generation and transmission coordination problem (GEPTEP). We consider a proactive framework in which a centralized TSO represents the upper level while the decentralized GENCOs, that trade in the market, represent the lower level. As a novel feature, an enhanced representative period framework is employed, which allows us to consider operation in both short and long-term storage technologies. A case study is presented to compare the results between perfect and imperfect competition in the market.es-ES
dc.description.abstractUnder the current European market environment, transmission companies have to decide network expansion by maximizing social welfare. However, generation companies (GENCOs) decide their capacity expansion with the aim of maximizing their own profit. This process, in addition to the increasing penetration of renewable energy, storage and distributed generation, might represent a rupture between short and long-term signals. Therefore, this paper proposes a bi-level formulation for the generation and transmission coordination problem (GEPTEP). We consider a proactive framework in which a centralized TSO represents the upper level while the decentralized GENCOs, that trade in the market, represent the lower level. As a novel feature, an enhanced representative period framework is employed, which allows us to consider operation in both short and long-term storage technologies. A case study is presented to compare the results between perfect and imperfect competition in the market.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Energy Strategy Reviews, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: , Página inicial: 154, Página final: 165es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleProactive transmission expansion planning with storage considerationses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordsProactive; Bi-level; Strategic; ransmission expansion; Generation expansion; Storagees-ES
dc.keywordsProactive; Bi-level; Strategic; ransmission expansion; Generation expansion; Storageen-GB
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
IIT-19-021A.pdf2,91 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
IIT-19-021A2,91 MBUnknownVisualizar/Abrir
IIT-19-021A2,91 MBUnknownVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.