Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/45688
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorBatlle López, Carloses-ES
dc.contributor.authorMastropietro, Paoloes-ES
dc.contributor.authorRodilla Rodríguez, Pabloes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-17T03:13:40Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-17T03:13:40Z-
dc.date.issued2020-08-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0960-1481es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.152es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractIn most power systems, residual costs (including, but not limited to, residual network costs and renewable support costs), are allocated through volumetric charges. This design, whose inefficiency has been latent in the last decades, is being challenged by the deployment of distributed energy resources, through which high-consumption customers may dramatically reduce the share of residual costs they pay, leaving a deficit to be paid by other customers. In principle, the most efficient alternative appears to be to allocate residual costs through fixed charges, but if these charges are flat, tariff equity is endangered. This article analyses the problem according to ratemaking theory, reviews the different allocation methodologies considered to date, and proposes a solution, based on uneven fixed charges, that allows to achieve efficiency, equity and cost recovery in modern electricity tariffs.es-ES
dc.description.abstractIn most power systems, residual costs (including, but not limited to, residual network costs and renewable support costs), are allocated through volumetric charges. This design, whose inefficiency has been latent in the last decades, is being challenged by the deployment of distributed energy resources, through which high-consumption customers may dramatically reduce the share of residual costs they pay, leaving a deficit to be paid by other customers. In principle, the most efficient alternative appears to be to allocate residual costs through fixed charges, but if these charges are flat, tariff equity is endangered. This article analyses the problem according to ratemaking theory, reviews the different allocation methodologies considered to date, and proposes a solution, based on uneven fixed charges, that allows to achieve efficiency, equity and cost recovery in modern electricity tariffs.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Renewable Energy, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: , Página inicial: 257, Página final: 266es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleRedesigning residual cost allocation in electricity tariffs: a proposal to balance efficiency, equity and cost recoveryes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordsResidual costs; Tariff design; Fixed charge; Equity; Demand elasticity; Grid defectiones-ES
dc.keywordsResidual costs; Tariff design; Fixed charge; Equity; Demand elasticity; Grid defectionen-GB
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
IIT-18-119A.pdf990 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir     Request a copy
IIT-18-119A_preview2,71 kBUnknownVisualizar/Abrir
IIT-18-119A_preview.pdf2,71 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.