Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/49384
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMartini, Alicees-ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-10T20:07:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-10T20:07:23Z-
dc.date.issued05/09/2019es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1753-9161es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/49384-
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractAcknowledging and drawing from previous literature uncomfortable with mainstream and state-centric approaches to counter-terrorism (Horgan and Boyle 2008; Herman and O’Sullivan 1989; Chomsky 1988; Zulaika and Douglass 1996), the founders of Critical Terrorism Studies put forward the label with the intention to institutionalise a critical stream of thought within Terrorism Studies (Jackson, Breen-Smyth, and Gunning 2009, 1). Their purpose was to create an “umbrella-term” to gather scholars from different backgrounds in an attempt to challenge but also complete and reformulate mainstream approaches to terrorism and counterterrorism. Among critical scholars’ efforts there has always been an attempt to be heard and influence academics but also policy-makers – although CTS scholars have not always agreed on practical aspects (see, among others, Fitzgerald, Ali, and Armstrong 2016; Jackson 2016b; Toros 2016; McGowan 2016). Therefore, it is not an overstatement to argue that the issue of normativity has always been central to Critical Terrorism Studies (CTS).es-ES
dc.description.abstractAcknowledging and drawing from previous literature uncomfortable with mainstream and state-centric approaches to counter-terrorism (Horgan and Boyle 2008; Herman and O’Sullivan 1989; Chomsky 1988; Zulaika and Douglass 1996), the founders of Critical Terrorism Studies put forward the label with the intention to institutionalise a critical stream of thought within Terrorism Studies (Jackson, Breen-Smyth, and Gunning 2009, 1). Their purpose was to create an “umbrella-term” to gather scholars from different backgrounds in an attempt to challenge but also complete and reformulate mainstream approaches to terrorism and counterterrorism. Among critical scholars’ efforts there has always been an attempt to be heard and influence academics but also policy-makers – although CTS scholars have not always agreed on practical aspects (see, among others, Fitzgerald, Ali, and Armstrong 2016; Jackson 2016b; Toros 2016; McGowan 2016). Therefore, it is not an overstatement to argue that the issue of normativity has always been central to Critical Terrorism Studies (CTS).en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Critical Studies on Terrorism, Periodo: 4, Volumen: 13, Número: 1, Página inicial: 47, Página final: 55es_ES
dc.titleRethinking terrorism and countering terrorism from a critical perspective.CTS and normativityes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordsnormativity, CTSes-ES
dc.keywordsnormativity, CTSen-GB
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Rethinking terrorism and countering terrorism from a critical perspective CTS and normativity.pdf930,42 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.