Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/5121
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorEchavarren Cerezo, Franciscoes-ES
dc.contributor.authorLobato Miguélez, Enriquees-ES
dc.contributor.authorRouco Rodríguez, Luises-ES
dc.contributor.authorGómez San Román, Tomáses-ES
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-15T11:17:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-15T11:17:45Z-
dc.date.issued2011-02-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0142-0615es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps:doi.org10.1016j.ijepes.2010.08.026es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractes-ES
dc.description.abstractA steady state security margin for a particular operating point can be defined as the distance from this initial point to the secure operating limits of the system. Four of the most used steady state security margins are the power flow feasibility margin, the contingency feasibility margin, the load margin to voltage collapse, and the total transfer capability between system areas. This is the second part of a two part paper. Part I has proposed a novel framework of a general model able to formulate, compute and improve any steady state security margin. In Part II the performance of the general model is validated by solving a variety of practical situations in modern real power systems. Actual examples of the Spanish power system will be used for this purpose. The same computation and improvement algorithms outlined in Part I have been applied for the four security margins considered in the study, outlining the convenience of defining a general framework valid for the four of them. The general model is used here in Part II to compute and improve: (a) the power flow feasibility margin (assessing the influence of the reactive power generation limits in the Spanish power system), (b) the contingency feasibility margin (assessing the influence of transmission and generation capacity in maintaining a correct voltage profile), (c) the load margin to voltage collapse (assessing the location and quantity of loads that must be shed in order to be far away from voltage collapse) and (d) the total transfer capability (assessing the export import pattern of electric power between different areas of the Spanish system).en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.sourceRevista: International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: 2, Página inicial: 347, Página final: 358es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleFormulation, computation and improvement of steady state security margins in power systems. Part II: resultses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.keywordses-ES
dc.keywordsSteady state analysis; Security margins; Power flow feasibility; Contingency analysis; Voltage collapse; Total transfer capability.en-GB
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
IIT-11-020A.pdf1,81 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir     Request a copy


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.