Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/58157
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.advisorMatanza Domingo, Javieres-Es
dc.contributor.advisorRodríguez Pecharromán, Ramónes-Es
dc.contributor.authorCaro Carretero, Raqueles-ES
dc.contributor.authorCarnicero López, Albertoes-ES
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Octavio, Jesús Ramónes-ES
dc.contributor.authorCousineau, Denises-ES
dc.contributor.other, Departamento de Electrónica, Automática y Comunicacioneses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-15T19:59:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-15T19:59:17Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-31es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0898-2112es_ES
dc.identifier.otherE000005813es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps:doi.org10.108008982112.2023.2286500es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractes-ES
dc.description.abstractA study was conducted on the tensile stress of an epoxy resin (Resoltech® 10501056). This was done by gathering a sample of 39 tensile strength data under consistent levels of stress. The tensile stress resistance is often characterized using a three-parameter Weibull distribution and the reliability of this characterization, given by confidence intervals (CIs). This approach commonly utilizes data-resampling techniques to estimate the CI of its parameters. CIs are constructed from six existing point-estimation methods. Herein, the jackknife was carried out to calculate the CIs using 39 subsamples and bootstrap methods using 100 or 200 subsamples. To date, there have been no studies exploring the effectiveness of subsampling methods for constructing CIs related to tensile strength. In this study, jackknifed and bootstrapped samples are used to implement the percentile method and three variations of the bias correction methods. We then performed simulations to evaluate the reliability of these methods using a Weibull random number generator. Our results showed that while the bias-corrected approach generated the most stable CIs from replicate samples, its accuracy was contingent on the point-estimation method employed. We also found that the different methods for calculating CIs resulted in significantly varying widths of the CIs.en-GB
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Quality Engineering, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: 4, Página inicial: 726, Página final: 742es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleUtilizing jackknife and bootstrap to understand tensile stress to failure of an epoxy resines_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordses-ES
dc.keywordsjackknife; bootstrap confidence intervals; three-parameter Weibull distribution; point-estimation methodsen-GB
asignatura.cursoacademico2022-2023es_ES
asignatura.periodoes_ES
asignatura.creditos6.0es_ES
asignatura.tipoObligatoria (Grado)es_ES
Aparece en las colecciones: KTT-Guías Docentes
GITTBA-Guías Docentes
Asignaturas

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Guía Docente.pdf228,24 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
IIT-24-012R2,41 MBUnknownVisualizar/Abrir
IIT-24-012R_preview3,08 kBUnknownVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.