Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/63463
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorWerlang, Anaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorCunha, Gabrieles-ES
dc.contributor.authorSerra, Julianaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Brunoes-ES
dc.contributor.authorNobrega Barroso, Luiz Augustoes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T04:01:29Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-11T04:01:29Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps:doi.org10.3390en14217428es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractes-ES
dc.description.abstractIn recent years electricity sectors worldwide have undergone major transformations, referred to as the “energy transition”. This has required energy planning to quickly adapt to provide useful inputs to the regulation activity so that a cost-effective electricity market emerges to facilitate the integration of renewables. This paper analyzes the role of system planning and regulations on two specific elements in the energy market design: the concept of firm capacity and the presence of distributed energy resources, both of which can be influenced by regulation. We assess the total cost of different regulatory mechanisms in the Brazilian and Mexican systems using optimization tools to determine optimal long-term expansion for a given regulatory framework. In particular, we quantitatively analyze the role of the current regulation in the total cost of these two electricity systems when compared to a reference “efficient” energy planning scenario that adopts standard cost-minimization principles and that is well suited to the most relevant features of the new energy transformation scenario. We show that two very common features of regulatory designs that can lead to distortions are: (i) renewables commonly having a lower “perceived cost” under the current regulations, either due to direct incentives such as tax breaks or due to indirect access to more attractive contracts or financing conditions; and (ii) requirements for reliability are often defined more conservatively than they should be, overstating the hardships imposed by renewable generation on the existing system and underestimating their potential to form portfolios.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Energies, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: 21, Página inicial: 7428-1, Página final: 7428-29es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleReliability metrics for generation planning and the role of regulation in the energy transition: case studies of Brazil and Mexicoes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordses-ES
dc.keywordsregulation; energy transition; Brazil; Mexico; renewables; reliability; generation system expansion; efficient energy planningen-GB
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
IIT-21-185R.pdf6,64 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.