Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/11531/79804
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wajner, Daniel F. | es-ES |
dc.contributor.author | Tas, Hakki | es-ES |
dc.contributor.author | Priego Moreno, Alberto | es-ES |
dc.contributor.author | Essa, Jony | es-ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-03T07:07:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-03T07:07:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-05-11 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22773-8_7 | es_ES |
dc.description | Capítulos en libros | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | . | es-ES |
dc.description.abstract | This chapter examines the foreign policies of contemporary populist leaderships in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). We adopt a comparative regional approach to “populist foreign policy” (PFP) in MENA, seeking to identify commonalities and differences that distinguish PFP in these countries, as well as national and international factors that allow or limit these regional trends. We place special emphasis on four cases: Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s Turkey (2003–), which is probably the most “paradigmatic” case of contemporary populism in the region, and three more “controversial” cases in terms of the theoretical applicability of populism as a category of political analysis—Abdel Fattah el-Sisi’s Egypt (2014–), Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s Iran (2005–2013), and Benjamin Netanyahu’s Israel (1996–1999, 2009–2021). Although the four cases differ greatly from each other, especially in their varied approaches to democracy, freedom, human rights, and the rule of law, we can still benefit from a comparative perspective of their PFPs. MENA’s PFP must be understood considering the geopolitical background of this region, which includes a combination of internal struggles, military conflicts, and external interventions. The study also highlights the role of civilizational and ethno-religious components in promoting and limiting collective action, as well as the differences in terms of PFP between countries with well-established democratic/authoritarian regimes and between parliamentary/presidential systems. | en-GB |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | es-ES | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Palgrave Macmillan Cham (Londres, Reino Unido) | es_ES |
dc.rights | es_ES | |
dc.rights.uri | es_ES | |
dc.source | Libro: Populist Foreign Policy: Regional Perspectives of Populism in the International Scene, Página inicial: 171, Página final: 197 | es_ES |
dc.title | Populist Foreign Policy in the Middle East and North Africa | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart | es_ES |
dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | La editorial no permite el acceso abierto | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | es_ES |
dc.keywords | . | es-ES |
dc.keywords | Foreign policies Populist leaderships Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Comparative regional approach Populist foreign policy (PFP) | en-GB |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
202362915572835_popu.pdf | 296,66 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir Request a copy |
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.