Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/86949
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorBalmaseda del Campo, Vicentees-ES
dc.contributor.authorCoronado Vaca, Maríaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorCadenas-Santiago, Gonzalo dees-ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T12:55:07Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-23T12:55:07Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2667-3053es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2023.200240es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstract.es-ES
dc.description.abstractSystemic risk is the risk of infection from an individual financial entity to the financial system due to existing interconnections. Having powerful tools to analyze and predict systemic risk in large financial networks is essential to ensure the stability of the financial system, avoiding the negative externalities derived from the failure of a systemically important financial institution. In this context, Machine Learning (ML) has proved to be a useful tool thanks to its ability to deal with complex relations. However, traditional techniques are limited in their use of the interactions between entities and the network structure, which has been shown to be of great importance for systemic risk. Thus, this work proposes Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for systemic risk analysis. GNNs use the network structure and feature information to deal with large-scale financial networks, providing the benefits of ML while using all the available information (node inter-relations and node, edge, and graph features). We also present C2R, an approach to reduce the pre-labeling effort for costly systemic risk metrics by pre-labeling into a small number of classes while predicting continuous risk scores. We have tested GNNs against traditional ML in classifying entities by systemic risk importance in two different networks, comparing their generalization capabilities with different amounts of available data. GNNs achieve a 94% and 15% Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC) average percentage increase compared to ML, achieving statistically significant MCC improvements in most scenarios. When combining C2R with GNNs to predict the systemic risk quantile from the class labels, the models achieve statistically significant improvements in the quantile RMSE. From our experiments, we can confirm that GNN models are better suited for systemic risk prediction on financial networks and should be preferred over traditional Machine Learning. The results obtained also confirm the fact that the network structure and the features of the relations (edge features) hold useful information for our task.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Intelligent Systems with Applications, Periodo: 1, Volumen: 19, Número: , Página inicial: 200240, Página final: .es_ES
dc.titlePredicting systemic risk in financial systems using Deep Graph Learninges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywords.es-ES
dc.keywordsGraph neural networks (GNN) Financial networks modeling model selection Neural networks Label regression network simulationen-GB
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Tamaño Formato  
predicting systemic risk.pdf8,84 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.