Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/87655
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorHigueras, Alfonsoes-ES
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Gilbertoes-ES
dc.contributor.authorBolaños, María de Lourdeses-ES
dc.contributor.authorRedondo, María Victoriaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorOlazábal, Isabel M.es-ES
dc.contributor.authorRUIZ-TOVAR POLO, JAIMEes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-08T10:40:24Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-08T10:40:24Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-13es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214946es_ES
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstract.es-ES
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have proven to be cost-effective in various surgical procedures, mainly in colorectal surgeries. However, there is still little scientific evidence evaluating the economic impact of their application in bariatric surgery. The present study aimed to compare the economic cost of performing a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following an ERAS protocol, with the costs of following a standard-of-care protocol. Patients and methods: A prospective non-randomized study of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients following an ERAS protocol and patients following a standard-of-care protocol. The total costs of the procedure were subdivided into pharmacological expenditures, surgical material, and time expenses, the price of complementary tests performed during the hospital stay, and costs related to the hospital stay. Results: The 84 patients included 58 women (69%) and 26 men (31%) with a mean age of 44.3 ± 11.6 years. There were no significant differences in age, gender, and distribution of comorbidities between groups. Postoperative pain, nausea or vomiting, and hospital stay were significantly lower within the ERAS group. The pharmacological expenditures, the price of complementary tests performed during the hospital stay, and the costs related to the hospital stay, were significantly lower in the ERAS group. There were no significant differences in the surgical material and surgical time costs between groups. Globally, the total cost of the procedure was significantly lower in the ERAS group with a mean saving of 1458.62$ per patient. The implementation of an ERAS protocol implied a mean saving of 21.25% of the total cost of the procedure. Conclusions: The implementation of an ERAS protocol significantly reduces the perioperative cost of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoes-ESes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.sourceRevista: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Periodo: 1, Volumen: 19, Número: 22, Página inicial: 14946, Página final: .es_ES
dc.titleEconomic impacto f the implementation o fan Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in a bariatric patient undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywords.es-ES
dc.keywordsRoux-en-Y gastric bypass; economic analysis; pharmacological costs; surgical material costs; surgical time costs; complementary test costs; bed occupancy costsen-GB
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Tamaño Formato  
202411914641474_Impacto economico ERAS RYGB.pdf344,43 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.