Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/88050
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorAlbaladejo, Romanaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorVillanueva, Rosaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorNavalpotro Fuster, Lourdeses-ES
dc.contributor.authorOrtega, Palomaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorAstasio, Palomaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorRegidor, Enriquees-ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-09T13:24:39Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-09T13:24:39Z-
dc.date.issued2014-11-19es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1181es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/88050-
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstract.es-ES
dc.description.abstractBackground: To assess whether the relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic context of residence and childhood obesity is explained by family socioeconomic position, risk behaviors and availability of sports facilities. Methods: Based on the income and educational level of residents in the neighborhoods of the city of Madrid, two indicators of socioeconomic context were calculated using the information about income and education and grouped into quartiles. In a sample of 727 children aged 6–15 years, the relationship of these indicators with overweight and obesity was studied using multilevel logit models. Results: With respect to children and adolescents living in neighborhoods having higher per capita incomes or higher population percentages with university education those living in neighborhoods having lower per capita incomes or lower population percentages with university education had age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of overweight that were 1.84 (95% CI, 1.03-3.29) and 1.68 (0.95-2.94) times higher, respectively. After adjustment for family socioeconomic position, unhealthy diet and physical inactivity, these ORs fell to 1.80 (0.99-3.29) and 1.56 (0.87-2.79), respectively. In the case of obesity, the age- and sex-adjusted ORs in these quartiles of both indicators of socioeconomic context were 3.35 (1.06-10.60) and 3.29 (1.03-10.52), respectively, rising to 3.77 (1.12-12.70) and 3.42 (1.00-11.68) after adjustment for the remaining variables. The highest OR was observed in the third quartile, except in the case of the relationship between per capita income and obesity. No relationship between the number of sport facilities per 1,000 population and physical inactivity was observed. Conclusion: The socioeconomic context is associated with obesity but not with overweight children in Madrid. The relationship is not explained by family socioeconomic position, risk behaviors and availability of sports facilities.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Bmc Public Health, Periodo: 1, Volumen: 14, Número: 1181, Página inicial: 1, Página final: 7es_ES
dc.titleRisk behaviors and sports facilities do not explain socioeconomic differences in childhood obesity: a cross-sectional studyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywords.es-ES
dc.keywordsSocioeconomic context, Obesity risk behaviors, Sports facilities, Childhood overweight, Childhood obesityen-GB
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Tamaño Formato  
20241261156479_12889_2014_Article_7266 (1).pdf293,99 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.