Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/94300
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorEscolá Gascon, Alexes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-19T06:38:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-19T06:38:37Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1550-8307es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2020.11.009es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/94300-
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstract.es-ES
dc.description.abstractContext An Anomalous Information Reception (AIR) experiment was developed. Objective To statistically examine the occurrence of AIR in multiple experimental tests and explore their predictive psychological mechanisms. Design First, we investigated whether human beings could guess the positive or negative content from 30 randomly selected images that would be presented on a computer screen, one at a time. Ninety participants reported being mediums and another 90 claimed to be nonbelievers in the paranormal. The participants were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions: (1) positive-relaxing environments, (2) neutral environments, and (3) negative-stimulating environments. Second, the prediction of successes recorded in the AIR experiment was tested using five Multivariable Multiaxial Suggestibility Inventory-2 (MMSI-2) scales that measured the altered state of consciousness (ASC) and suggestibility. Results The successes did not exceed the estimated chance. The only significant results revealed that mediums obtained a greater number of correct answers than the non-believing participants. Bayesian estimation also confirmed these results. In the same way, the altered states of consciousness and suggestibility negatively predicted 25.8% of successes in the AIR experiment. Conclusions Insufficient statistical evidence was obtained for AIR. The results raise doubts about previous theories on AIR. Further research is required. Nevertheless, mediums obtained more success answers than nonbelievers did. This means that the anomalous sheep-goat effect is also present in mediums and supports results obtained in previous studies.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing, Periodo: 1, Volumen: 18, Número: 2, Página inicial: 170, Página final: 178es_ES
dc.titleForced-choice experiment on Anomalous Information Reception and correlations with states of consciousness using the Multivariable Multiaxial Suggestibility Inventory-2 (MMSI-2)es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywords.es-ES
dc.keywordsMediumship Anomalous Information Reception MMSI-2 “Psi” phenomena Parapsychology Anomalous cognitionen-GB
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Tamaño Formato  
202491720254058_1-s2.0-S1550830720303785-main (1).pdf421,73 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.