Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/11531/96223
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorLinares Hurtado, José Ignacioes-ES
dc.contributor.authorArenas Pinilla, Eva Maríaes-ES
dc.contributor.authorMontes Pita, María Josées-ES
dc.contributor.authorCantizano González, Alexises-ES
dc.contributor.authorPérez Domínguez, José Rubénes-ES
dc.contributor.authorPorras Galán, Josées-ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-25T16:46:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-25T16:46:32Z-
dc.date.issued2024-09-01es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2214-157Xes_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps:doi.org10.1016j.csite.2024.105021es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/96223-
dc.descriptionArtículos en revistases_ES
dc.description.abstractes-ES
dc.description.abstractThree layouts of Brayton supercritical CO2 power cycles directly coupled to the receiver are proposed for Generation 3 solar power plants: conventional recompression, recompression with partial cooling, and recompression with intercooling. To achieve direct coupling, the solar heat is introduced downstream of the turbine, where CO2 pressure is lower. A higher temperature rise diminishes the receiver's dimensions, thus increasing its energy efficiency. It also lowers the average working temperature since the maximum temperature is fixed at 700 °C, thereby reducing losses. However, optical efficiency decreases as the receiver size diminishes. Both intercooling and partial cooling layouts further increase the cycle's net efficiency, which reduces the receiver's size, following similar trends observed with an increase in temperature rise. Considering all these effects, various factors push in opposite directions, affecting overall efficiency and costs. This competitive interplay results in overall efficiencies ranging from 30.26  to 31.58  and Levelized Costs of Electricity (LCOEs) between 162.47 €MWh and 166.81 €MWh. In conclusion, similar outcomes in terms of energy and economics are achieved with the three layouts, suggesting the simplest layout (recompression) as the most advisable. If thermal storage is incorporated, partial cooling becomes preferable due to its significant increase in the receiver's temperature rise.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-streames_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.sourceRevista: Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, Periodo: 1, Volumen: online, Número: , Página inicial: 105021-1, Página final: 105021-19es_ES
dc.subject.otherInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica (IIT)es_ES
dc.titleDirect coupling of pressurized gas receiver to a brayton supercritical CO2 power cycle in solar thermal power plantses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordses-ES
dc.keywordsCSP; Supercritical CO2 power cycle; Pressurized gas receiver; Microchannel receiveren-GB
Aparece en las colecciones: Artículos

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Tamaño Formato  
IIT-24-257R5,51 MBUnknownVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.