Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/11531/97361
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Maravall Buckwalter, Isabel | es-ES |
dc.contributor.author | Dubin, Adam David | es-ES |
dc.contributor.author | Durojaye, Ebenezer | es-ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-11T07:45:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-11T07:45:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2025-01-28 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0021-8553 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855324000354 | es_ES |
dc.description | Artículos en revistas | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | . | es-ES |
dc.description.abstract | On 19 August 2020, the Constitutional Court of Uganda handed down a landmark judgment on maternal health rights in Uganda. This judgment held that the State of Uganda was responsible for violating the right to health, non-discrimination, life and inhuman and degrading treatment of women under international law and Ugandan constitutional law for its failure by omission to provide basic emergency obstetric care in public facilities. This article examines the contribution of the Constitutional Petition No 16 judgment to the strengthening of women’s reproductive health rights. By rejecting the “lack of resources” defence when complying with minimum core obligations under progressive realization in the provision of emergency obstetric services, the court makes an important contribution to the limited but growing body of jurisprudence holding governments accountable for a failure to ensure the protection of women’s sexual and reproductive rights at both domestic and international levels. | en-GB |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | en-GB | es_ES |
dc.rights | es_ES | |
dc.rights.uri | es_ES | |
dc.source | Revista: Journal of African Law, Periodo: 1, Volumen: Online first, Número: Online first, Página inicial: 1, Página final: 21 | es_ES |
dc.title | The Contribution of Uganda’s Constitutional Court Petition No 16 Judgment to the Right of Access to Quality Emergency Obstetric Care under International Law | es_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es_ES |
dc.description.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.rights.holder | política editorial | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | es_ES |
dc.keywords | . | es-ES |
dc.keywords | : Emergency obstetric care; minimum core obligations; progressive realization; women’s rights; sexual and reproductive health; lack-of-resources defence | en-GB |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Artículos |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2025129165552556_contribution_of_ugandas_constitut.pdf | 311,76 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir Request a copy |
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.