• English
    • español
  • English 
    • English
    • español
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • 2.- Investigación
  • Artículos
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • 2.- Investigación
  • Artículos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Who Has Anomalous Experiences Today? Evidence for the Highly Sensitive Person Paradox

Thumbnail
View/Open
20251023101423942_escola-gascon-et-al-2025-who-has.pdf (895.6Kb)
Date
2025-06-06
Author
Escolá Gascon, Alex
French, Christopher C.
Dagnall, Neil
Denovan, Andrew
Rujano, Alejandro
Estado
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Metadata
Show full item record
Mostrar METS del ítem
Ver registro en CKH

Refworks Export

Abstract
Este estudio analiza la relación entre los rasgos de persona altamente sensible (HSP) y las experiencias anómalas (APP) en el marco del Modelo de Continuo de Psicosis (PCM). Con una muestra de 1.215 adultos españoles, se evalúa el Modelo Integrado de Sensibilidad-Temperamento de la Experiencia Anómala (ITSTAE), que combina variables de temperamento, sensibilidad y rasgos psicóticos. Los resultados muestran que los rasgos HSP no incrementan las experiencias anómalas; al contrario, cuando se introducen en el PCM, la sensibilidad actúa como un factor protector. El modelo explicó el 61,4 % de la varianza en APP, confirmando que la sensibilidad puede ser una forma de complejidad psicológica protectora frente a la psicopatología.
 
Anomalous experiences are often viewed as red flags for psychosis—yet many individuals who report them show no signs of clinical disorder. This study reveals a paradox: traits associated with the Highly Sensitive Person (HSP) do not increase Anomalous Perceived Phenomena (APP). Instead, when considered within the Psychosis Continuum Model (PCM), sensitivity appears to act as a suppressor. Drawing on data from 1215 adults, we tested the Integrated Temperamental-Sensitivity Theory of Anomalous Experience (ITSTAE), a multifactorial model integrating temperament, HSP traits, and PCM dynamics. As expected, psychotic traits predicted higher APP scores. However, HSP traits only became predictive when moderated by PCM—and notably, the effect was negative. The more sensitive the individual, the fewer anomalous perceptions they reported under psychotic pressure. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) confirmed the model’s fit, with explained variance in APP rising from 47.1% to 61.4% when PCM mediation was included. Multitrait-Multimethod (MTMM) analyses further validated the conceptual independence of HSP and PCM. These findings challenge psychiatric reductionism and suggest a more nuanced, non-pathologizing lens on altered perception. Far from signaling fragility, heightened sensitivity may serve as a buffer—a cognitive shield—against psychosis-linked anomalous experiences. This model reframes sensitivity not as vulnerability, but as a form of psychological complexity
 
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11531/106697
Who Has Anomalous Experiences Today? Evidence for the Highly Sensitive Person Paradox
Tipo de Actividad
Artículos en revistas
ISSN
0033-2941
Palabras Clave
Temperamento, experiencias anómalas, persona altamente sensible, psicosis, modelo de sensibilidad, percepción, teoría ITSTAE.
Temperament, psychosis continuum model, paranormal beliefs, anomalous experiences, highly sensitive person
Collections
  • Artículos

Repositorio de la Universidad Pontificia Comillas copyright © 2015  Desarrollado con DSpace Software
Contact Us | Send Feedback
 

 

Búsqueda semántica (CKH Explorer)


Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_advisorxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_typeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_advisorxmlui.ArtifactBrowser.Navigation.browse_type

My Account

LoginRegister

Repositorio de la Universidad Pontificia Comillas copyright © 2015  Desarrollado con DSpace Software
Contact Us | Send Feedback